(no commit message)

diff --git a/doc/bugs/listdirectives_doesn__39__t_register_a_link.mdwn b/doc/bugs/listdirectives_doesn__39__t_register_a_link.mdwn
index 87588cb089de5d8a1c365179d7d307058139a326..19a8c99d8fa2b89a390158282ede9059d50b0217 100644 (file)
--- a/doc/bugs/listdirectives_doesn__39__t_register_a_link.mdwn
+++ b/doc/bugs/listdirectives_doesn__39__t_register_a_link.mdwn
@@ -35,3 +35,17 @@ The [[ikiwiki/directive/listdirectives]]` directive doesn't register a link betw
 
 > No follow-up or objection for a while, so considering this to
 > be [[working as designed|done]]. --[[smcv]]
 
 > No follow-up or objection for a while, so considering this to
 > be [[working as designed|done]]. --[[smcv]]

+
+> > Seems I'm a bit late to butt in, but would it be possible to have two
+> > further phases after the scan phase, the first running map and inline 
+> > and the second orphan? Then map and inline could log or register their 
+> > links (obviously somewhere were it won't change the result of the link function)
+> > and orphan could take them into account. This logging could be
+> > turned on by parameter to not waste time for users not needing this and 
+> > make it tunable (i.e. so that the user can decide which map directives count and which don't)
+> > 
+> > For someone using map and especially autoindex the output of the orphans directive
+> > is simply wrong/useless (at least it is for me). And there is no easy workaround like for listdirectives
+> > -- [[holger]]
+
+