## on monty (my laptop)
I wonder why a "pull" doesn't just init a repo like a "svn co" does?
-
-I think I should have used `git-clone ssh://si.dabase.com/home/hendry/wikiwc/.git/`
+Ah, I should have used `git-clone ssh://si.dabase.com/home/hendry/wikiwc/.git/`
monty:~/git-testing% git-init
Initialized empty Git repository in .git/
Created commit d3507df: added test
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
-I think I should have used `git push origin` here...
+I should have used `git push origin` here...
monty:~/git-testing% git-push ssh://si.dabase.com/home/hendry/wikiwc/.git/
updating 'refs/heads/master'
hendry:242$ git-checkout master usb.mdwn
+I find this a little odd... Is this a required step for ikiwiki?
# Stuff I am confused about
* this master/origin stuff
* why do I have to explicitly say the filename "usb.mdwn" for it to be updated?
-* why do I have to explicitly have to write the url if I am going a git-pull again? I know I can alias it, but why can't it just pull from the last source?
* how ikiwiki interfaces with git. does it have its own working copy? or is it the files simply in ~/wikiwc?
* I know git-push seems unpopular (git-pull seems to have the emphasis), though I think it is really convenient