+ > I don't think multimarkdown is a good solution. It served a useful
+ > purpose when we were defaulting to [[!cpan Text::Markdown]] or to
+ > `markdown.pl`, but now that we're using Discount by default,
+ > Multimarkdown is mostly a trap for the unwary - it's a less predictable
+ > and (in general) less featureful parser than Discount. Ideally we'd
+ > always be using CommonMark or Discount these days, but as
+ > far as I know there's still no API-stable CommonMark library. --[[smcv]]
+