Answer to smcv

diff --git a/doc/bugs/Checksum_errors_on_the_pristine-tar_branch.mdwn b/doc/bugs/Checksum_errors_on_the_pristine-tar_branch.mdwn
index 112f0c2d76144baf2ebf3b6b06f2c74aaed5a83c..e59a69720245a1ebd37706fdd35ba0c9a99aae13 100644 (file)
--- a/doc/bugs/Checksum_errors_on_the_pristine-tar_branch.mdwn
+++ b/doc/bugs/Checksum_errors_on_the_pristine-tar_branch.mdwn
@@ -11,6 +11,8 @@ I'm in the process of installing ikiwiki on my home page (hooray), and wants to
 > Downloading the tarball from Debian is the other recommended way to
 > [[download]] the source code. --[[smcv]]
 
 > Downloading the tarball from Debian is the other recommended way to
 > [[download]] the source code. --[[smcv]]
 

+>> Thanks for your responses, smcv. I'll use that method and install the newest version when I'm more familiar with the way ikiwiki works. For now I'm using version 3.20100122 installed with apt-get. Works great so far, but I'm looking forward to the new install. -- [[sunny256]] 2011-02-22 19:30+0100
+

 But I'm unable to recreate the newest `.tar` file, in fact there's errors in all these `.tar.gz` files on that branch:
 
 * `ikiwiki_2.20.tar.gz`
 But I'm unable to recreate the newest `.tar` file, in fact there's errors in all these `.tar.gz` files on that branch:
 
 * `ikiwiki_2.20.tar.gz`


@@ -41,7 +43,7 @@ The operation fails on these files with a "Checksum validation failed" error fro
 
 A complete output of the "pristine-tar checkout" of all files is stored on <https://gist.github.com/836720> .
 
 
 A complete output of the "pristine-tar checkout" of all files is stored on <https://gist.github.com/836720> .
 

-For now, I'll download the `.tar.gz` from <http://packages.debian.org/unstable/source/ikiwiki>, or maybe install `ikiwiki_3.20110124_all.deb`. Would you recommend using that `.deb` file on Ubuntu 10.04.2 LTS, or is it Debian-specific? -- sunny256 2011-02-21 08:42+0100
+For now, I'll download the `.tar.gz` from <http://packages.debian.org/unstable/source/ikiwiki>, or maybe install `ikiwiki_3.20110124_all.deb`. Would you recommend using that `.deb` file on Ubuntu 10.04.2 LTS, or is it Debian-specific? -- [[sunny256]] 2011-02-21 08:42+0100

 
 > The .deb from Debian unstable is likely to work on Ubuntu; I've
 > generally been able to compile snapshots on Debian unstable and
 
 > The .deb from Debian unstable is likely to work on Ubuntu; I've
 > generally been able to compile snapshots on Debian unstable and