1 This is an idea from [[JoshTriplett]]. --[[Joey]]
3 * See further discussion at [[forum/an_alternative_approach_to_structured_data]].
5 Some uses of ikiwiki, such as for a bug-tracking system (BTS), move a bit away from the wiki end
6 of the spectrum, and toward storing structured data about a page or instead
9 For example, in a bug report you might want to choose a severity from a
10 list, enter a version number, and have a bug submitter or owner recorded,
11 etc. When editing online, it would be nice if these were separate fields on
12 the form, rather than the data being edited in the big edit form.
14 There's a tension here between remaining a wiki with human-editable source
15 files, containing freeform markup, and more structured data storage. I
16 think that it would be best to include the structured data in the page,
17 using a directive. Something like:
20 \[[data yaml="<arbitrary yaml here>"]]
23 As long as the position of the directive is not significant, it could be
24 stripped out when web editing, the yaml used to generate/populate form fields,
25 and then on save, the directive regenerated and inserted at top/bottom of
28 Josh thinks that yaml is probably a good choice, but the source could be a
29 `.yaml` file that contains no directives, and just yaml. An addition
30 complication in this scenario is, if the yaml included wiki page formatted content,
31 ikiwiki would have to guess or be told what markup language it used.
33 Either way, the yaml on the page would encode fields and their current content.
34 Information about data types would be encoded elsewhere, probably on a
35 parent page (using a separate directive). That way, all child pages could
36 be forced to have the same fields.
38 There would be some simple types like select, boolean, multiselect, string, wiki markup.
39 Probably lists of these (ie, list of strings). Possibly more complex data
42 It should also be possible for plugins to define new types, and the type
43 definitions should include validation of entered data, and how to prompt
44 the user for the data.
46 This seems conceptually straightforward, if possibly quite internally
47 complex to handle the more complicated types and validation.
49 One implementation wrinkle is how to build the html form. The editpage.tmpl
50 currently overrides the standard [[!cpan CGI::FormBuilder]] generated form,
51 which was done to make the edit page be laid out in a nice way. This,
52 however, means that new fields cannot be easily added to it using
53 [[!cpan CGI::FormBuilder]]. The attachment plugin uses the hack of bouilding
54 up html by hand and dumping it into the form via a template variable.
56 It would be nice if the type implementation code could just use
57 FormBuilder, since its automatic form generation, and nice field validation
58 model is a perfect match for structured data. But this problem with
59 editpage.tmpl would have to be sorted out to allow that.
63 * Pagespecs that can select pages with a field with a given value, etc.
64 This should use a pagespec function like field(fieldname, value). The
65 semantics of this will depend on the type of the field; text fields will
66 match value against the text, and link fields will check for a link
67 matching the pagespec value.
68 * The search plugin could allow searching for specific fields with specific
69 content. (xapian term search is a good fit).
73 [[tracking_bugs_with_dependencies]]
75 > I was also thinking about this for bug tracking. I'm not sure what
76 > sort of structured data is wanted in a page, so I decided to brainstorm
79 > * You just want the page to be pretty.
80 > * You want to access the data from another page. This would be almost like
81 > like a database lookup, or the OpenOffice Calc [VLookup](http://wiki.services.openoffice.org/wiki/Documentation/How_Tos/Calc:_VLOOKUP_function) function.
82 > * You want to make a pagespec depend upon the data. This could be used
83 > for dependancy tracking - you could match against pages listed as dependencies,
84 > rather than all pages linked from a given page.
86 >The first use case is handled by having a template in the page creation. You could
91 >have some type of form to edit the data, but that's just sugar on top of the template.
92 >If you were going to have a web form to edit the data, I can imagine a few ways to do it:
94 > * Have a special page type which gets compiled into the form. The page type would
95 > need to define the form as well as hold the stored data.
96 > * Have special directives that allow you to insert form elements into a normal page.
98 >I'm happy with template based page creation as a first pass...
100 >The second use case could be handled by a regular expression directive. eg:
102 > \[[regex spec="myBug" regex="Depends: ([^\s]+)"]]
104 > The directive would be replaced with the match from the regex on the 'myBug' page... or something.
106 >The third use case requires a pagespec function. One that matched a regex in the page might work.
107 >Otherwise, another option would be to annotate links with a type, and then check the type of links in
108 >a pagespec. e.g. you could have `depends` links and normal links.
110 >Anyway, I just wanted to list the thoughts. In none of these use cases is straight yaml or json the
111 >obvious answer. -- [[Will]]
113 >> Okie. I've had a play with this. A 'form' plugin is included inline below, but it is only a rough first pass to
114 >> get a feel for the design space.
116 >> The current design defines a new type of page - a 'form'. The type of page holds YAML data
117 >> defining a FormBuilder form. For example, if we add a file to the wiki source `test.form`:
122 comment: This is a test
126 >> The YAML content is a series of nested hashes. The outer hash is currently checked for two keys:
127 >> 'template', which specifies a parameter to pass to the FromBuilder as the template for the
128 >> form, and 'fields', which specifies the data for the fields on the form.
129 >> each 'field' is itself a hash. The keys and values are arguments to the formbuilder form method.
130 >> The most important one is 'value', which specifies the value of that field.
132 >> Using this, the plugin below can output a form when asked to generate HTML. The Formbuilder
133 >> arguments are sanitized (need a thorough security audit here - I'm sure I've missed a bunch of
134 >> holes). The form is generated with default values as supplied in the YAML data. It also has an
135 >> 'Update Form' button at the bottom.
137 >> The 'Update Form' button in the generated HTML submits changed values back to IkiWiki. The
138 >> plugin captures these new values, updates the YAML and writes it out again. The form is
139 >> validated when edited using this method. This method can only edit the values in the form.
140 >> You cannot add new fields this way.
142 >> It is still possible to edit the YAML directly using the 'edit' button. This allows adding new fields
143 >> to the form, or adding other formbuilder data to change how the form is displayed.
145 >> One final part of the plugin is a new pagespec function. `form_eq()` is a pagespec function that
146 >> takes two arguments (separated by a ','). The first argument is a field name, the second argument
147 >> a value for that field. The function matches forms (and not other page types) where the named
148 >> field exists and holds the value given in the second argument. For example:
150 \[[!inline pages="form_eq(age,15)" archive="yes"]]
152 >> will include a link to the page generated above.
154 >>> Okie, I've just made another plugin to try and do things in a different way.
155 >>> This approach adds a 'data' directive. There are two arguments, `key` and `value`.
156 >>> The directive is replaced by the value. There is also a match function, which is similar
157 >>> to the one above. It also takes two arguments, a key and a value. It returns true if the
158 >>> page has that key/value pair in a data directive. e.g.:
160 \[[!data key="age" value="15"]]
162 >>> then, in another page:
164 \[[!inline pages="data_eq(age,15)" archive="yes"]]
166 >>> I expect that we could have more match functions for each type of structured data,
167 >>> I just wanted to implement a rough prototype to get a feel for how it behaves. -- [[Will]]
169 >> Anyway, here are the plugins. As noted above these are only preliminary, exploratory, attempts. -- [[Will]]
171 >>>> I've just updated the second of the two patches below. The two patches are not mutually
172 >>>> exclusive, but I'm leaning towards the second as more useful (for the things I'm doing). -- [[Will]]
174 I think it's awesome that you're writing this code to explore the problem
175 space, [[Will]] -- and these plugins are good stabs at at least part of it.
176 Let me respond to a few of your comments.. --[[Joey]]
178 On use cases, one use case is a user posting a bug report with structured
179 data in it. A template is one way, but then the user has to deal with the
180 format used to store the structured data. This is where a edit-time form
183 > This was the idea with the 'form' plugin. With the 'data' plugin I was exploring
184 > a different approach: try to keep the markup simple enough that the user can edit
185 > the markup directly, and still have that be ok. I admit it is a stretch, but I thought
186 > it worth exploring.
188 Another use case is, after many such bugs have been filed,
189 wanting to add a new field to each bug report. To avoid needing to edit
190 every bug report it would be good if the fields in a bug report were
191 defined somewhere else, so that just that one place can be edited to add
192 the new field, and it will show up in each bug report (and in each bug
193 report's edit page, as a new form field).
195 > If I was going to do that, I'd use a perl script on a checked out
196 > workspace. I think you're describing a rare operation and
197 > so I'd be happy not having a web interface for it. Having said that,
198 > if you just wanted to change the form for *new* pages, then you
199 > can just edit the template used to create new pages.
201 Re the form plugin, I'm uncomfortable with tying things into
202 [[!cpan CGI::FormBuilder]] quite so tightly as you have.
204 > Yeah :). But I wanted to explore the space and that was the
205 > easiest way to start.
208 could easily change in a way that broke whole wikis full of pages. Also,
209 needing to sanitize FormBuilder fields with security implications is asking
210 for trouble, since new FormBuilder features could add new fields, or
211 add new features to existing fields (FormBuilder is very DWIM) that open
214 > There is a list of allowed fields. I only interpret those.
216 I think that having a type system, that allows defining specific types,
217 like "email address", by writing code (that in turn can use FormBuilder),
218 is a better approach, since it should avoid becoming a security problem.
220 > That would be possible. I think an extension to the 'data' plugin might
223 One specific security hole, BTW, is that if you allow the `validate` field,
224 FormBuilder will happily treat it as a regexp, and we don't want to expose
225 arbitrary perl regexps, since they can at least DOS a system, and can
226 probably be used to run arbitrary perl code.
228 > I validate the validate field :). It only allows validate fields that match
229 > `/^[\w\s]+$/`. This means you can really only use the pre-defined
230 > validation types in FormBuilder.
232 The data plugin only deals with a fairly small corner of the problem space,
233 but I think does a nice job at what it does. And could probably be useful
234 in a large number of other cases.
236 > I think the data plugin is more likely to be useful than the form plugin.
237 > I was thinking of extending the data directive by allowing an 'id' parameter.
238 > When you have an id parameter, then you can display a small form for that
239 > data element. The submission handler would look through the page source
240 > for the data directive with the right id parameter and edit it. This would
241 > make the data directive more like the current 'form' plugin.
243 > That is making things significantly more complex for less significant gain though. --[[Will]]
245 > Oh, one quick other note. The data plugin below was designed to handle multiple
246 > data elements in a single directive. e.g.
248 \[[!data key="Depends on" link="bugs/bugA" link="bugs/bugB" value=6]]
250 > would match `data_eq(Depends on,6)`, `data_link(Depends on,bugs/bugA)`, `data_link(Depends on,bugs/bugB)`
251 > or, if you applied the patch in [[todo/tracking_bugs_with_dependencies]] then you can use 'defined pagespecs'
252 > such as `data_link(Depends on,~openBugs)`. <a id="another_kind_of_links" />The ability to label links like this allows separation of
253 > dependencies between bugs from arbitrary links.
254 >> This issue (the need for distinguished kinds of links) has also been brought up in other discussions: [[tracking_bugs_with_dependencies#another_kind_of_links]] (deps vs. links) and [[tag_pagespec_function]] (tags vs. links). --Ivan Z.
256 >>> And multiple link types are now supported; plugins can set the link
257 >>> type when registering a link, and pagespec functions can match on them. --[[Joey]]
262 # Interpret YAML data to make a web form
263 package IkiWiki::Plugin::form;
267 use CGI::FormBuilder;
271 hook(type => "getsetup", id => "form", call => \&getsetup);
272 hook(type => "htmlize", id => "form", call => \&htmlize);
273 hook(type => "sessioncgi", id => "form", call => \&cgi_submit);
280 rebuild => 1, # format plugin
284 sub makeFormFromYAML ($$$) {
286 my $YAMLString = shift;
291 eval q{use CGI::FormBuilder};
294 my ($dataHashRef) = YAML::Load($YAMLString);
296 my @fields = keys %{ $dataHashRef->{fields} };
298 unshift(@fields, 'do');
299 unshift(@fields, 'page');
300 unshift(@fields, 'rcsinfo');
302 # print STDERR "Fields: @fields\n";
306 $submittedPage = $q->param('page') if defined $q;
308 if (defined $q && defined $submittedPage && ! ($submittedPage eq $page)) {
309 error("Submitted page doensn't match current page: $page, $submittedPage");
312 error("Page not backed by file") unless defined $pagesources{$page};
313 my $file = $pagesources{$page};
317 if (defined $dataHashRef->{template}) {
318 $template = $dataHashRef->{template};
320 $template = "form.tmpl";
323 my $form = CGI::FormBuilder->new(
327 required => [qw{page}],
329 action => $config{cgiurl},
330 template => scalar IkiWiki::template_params($template),
331 wikiname => $config{wikiname},
338 $form->field(name => 'do', value => 'Update Form', required => 1, force => 1, type => 'hidden');
339 $form->field(name => 'page', value => $page, required => 1, force => 1, type => 'hidden');
340 $form->field(name => 'rcsinfo', value => IkiWiki::rcs_prepedit($file), required => 1, force => 0, type => 'hidden');
343 foreach my $x (qw{label type multiple value fieldset growable message other required validate cleanopts columns comment disabled linebreaks class}) {
347 while ( my ($name, $data) = each(%{ $dataHashRef->{fields} }) ) {
348 next if $name eq 'page';
349 next if $name eq 'rcsinfo';
351 while ( my ($key, $value) = each(%{ $data }) ) {
352 next unless $validkey{$key};
353 next if $key eq 'validate' && !($value =~ /^[\w\s]+$/);
355 # print STDERR "Adding to field $name: $key => $value\n";
356 $form->field(name => $name, $key => $value);
360 # IkiWiki::decode_form_utf8($form);
367 my $content = $params{content};
368 my $page = $params{page};
370 my $form = makeFormFromYAML($page, $content, undef);
372 return $form->render(submit => 'Update Form');
375 sub cgi_submit ($$) {
379 my $do=$q->param('do');
380 return unless $do eq 'Update Form';
381 IkiWiki::decode_cgi_utf8($q);
385 eval q{use CGI::FormBuilder};
388 my $page = $q->param('page');
390 return unless exists $pagesources{$page};
392 return unless $pagesources{$page} =~ m/\.form$/ ;
394 return unless IkiWiki::check_canedit($page, $q, $session);
396 my $file = $pagesources{$page};
397 my $YAMLString = readfile(IkiWiki::srcfile($file));
398 my $form = makeFormFromYAML($page, $YAMLString, $q);
400 my ($dataHashRef) = YAML::Load($YAMLString);
402 if ($form->submitted eq 'Update Form' && $form->validate) {
404 #first update our data structure
406 while ( my ($name, $data) = each(%{ $dataHashRef->{fields} }) ) {
407 next if $name eq 'page';
408 next if $name eq 'rcs-data';
410 if (defined $q->param($name)) {
411 $data->{value} = $q->param($name);
415 # now write / commit the data
417 writefile($file, $config{srcdir}, YAML::Dump($dataHashRef));
419 my $message = "Web form submission";
421 IkiWiki::disable_commit_hook();
422 my $conflict=IkiWiki::rcs_commit($file, $message,
423 $form->field("rcsinfo"),
424 $session->param("name"), $ENV{REMOTE_ADDR});
425 IkiWiki::enable_commit_hook();
426 IkiWiki::rcs_update();
428 require IkiWiki::Render;
431 IkiWiki::redirect($q, "$config{url}/".htmlpage($page)."?updated");
434 error("Invalid data!");
440 package IkiWiki::PageSpec;
442 sub match_form_eq ($$;@) {
445 my @args=split(/,/, $argSet);
446 my $field=shift @args;
447 my $value=shift @args;
449 my $file = $IkiWiki::pagesources{$page};
451 if ($file !~ m/\.form$/) {
452 return IkiWiki::FailReason->new("page is not a form");
455 my $YAMLString = IkiWiki::readfile(IkiWiki::srcfile($file));
460 my ($dataHashRef) = YAML::Load($YAMLString);
462 if (! defined $dataHashRef->{fields}->{$field}) {
463 return IkiWiki::FailReason->new("field '$field' not defined in page");
466 my $formVal = $dataHashRef->{fields}->{$field}->{value};
468 if ($formVal eq $value) {
469 return IkiWiki::SuccessReason->new("field value matches");
471 return IkiWiki::FailReason->new("field value does not match");
480 # Allow data embedded in a page to be checked for
481 package IkiWiki::Plugin::data;
490 hook(type => "getsetup", id => "data", call => \&getsetup);
491 hook(type => "needsbuild", id => "data", call => \&needsbuild);
492 hook(type => "preprocess", id => "data", call => \&preprocess, scan => 1);
493 hook(type => "preprocess", id => "datatable", call => \&preprocess_table, scan => 1); # does this need scan?
500 rebuild => 1, # format plugin
505 my $needsbuild=shift;
506 foreach my $page (keys %pagestate) {
507 if (exists $pagestate{$page}{data}) {
508 if (exists $pagesources{$page} &&
509 grep { $_ eq $pagesources{$page} } @$needsbuild) {
510 # remove state, it will be re-added
511 # if the preprocessor directive is still
512 # there during the rebuild
513 delete $pagestate{$page}{data};
521 my %params=@argslist;
524 my $class = defined $params{class}
525 ? 'class="'.$params{class}.'"'
529 $html = "<th $class >$params{key}:</th><td $class >";
531 $html = "<span $class >$params{key}:";
534 while (scalar(@argslist) > 1) {
535 my $type = shift @argslist;
536 my $data = shift @argslist;
537 if ($type eq 'link') {
539 $pagestate{$params{page}}{data}{$params{key}}{link}{$data} = 1;
540 my $link=IkiWiki::linkpage($data);
541 add_depends($params{page}, $link);
542 $html .= ' ' . htmllink($params{page}, $params{destpage}, $link);
543 } elsif ($type eq 'data') {
544 $data = IkiWiki::preprocess($params{page}, $params{destpage},
545 IkiWiki::filter($params{page}, $params{destpage}, $data));
546 $html .= ' ' . $data;
547 # store data after processing - allows pagecounts to be stored, etc.
548 $pagestate{$params{page}}{data}{$params{key}}{data}{$data} = 1;
561 sub preprocess_table (@) {
565 push @lines, defined $params{class}
566 ? "<table class=\"".$params{class}.'">'
571 foreach my $line (split(/\n/, $params{datalist})) {
572 push @lines, "<tr>" . IkiWiki::preprocess($params{page}, $params{destpage},
573 IkiWiki::filter($params{page}, $params{destpage}, $line)) . "</tr>";
578 push @lines, '</table>';
580 return join("\n", @lines);
583 package IkiWiki::PageSpec;
585 sub match_data_eq ($$;@) {
588 my @args=split(/,/, $argSet);
590 my $value=shift @args;
592 if (! exists $IkiWiki::pagestate{$page}{data}) {
593 return IkiWiki::FailReason->new("page does not contain any data directives");
596 if (! exists $IkiWiki::pagestate{$page}{data}{$key}) {
597 return IkiWiki::FailReason->new("page does not contain data key '$key'");
600 if ($IkiWiki::pagestate{$page}{data}{$key}{data}{$value}) {
601 return IkiWiki::SuccessReason->new("value matches");
603 return IkiWiki::FailReason->new("value does not match");
607 sub match_data_link ($$;@) {
611 my @args=split(/,/, $argSet);
613 my $value=shift @args;
615 if (! exists $IkiWiki::pagestate{$page}{data}) {
616 return IkiWiki::FailReason->new("page $page does not contain any data directives and so cannot match a link");
619 if (! exists $IkiWiki::pagestate{$page}{data}{$key}) {
620 return IkiWiki::FailReason->new("page $page does not contain data key '$key'");
623 foreach my $link (keys %{ $IkiWiki::pagestate{$page}{data}{$key}{link} }) {
624 # print STDERR "Checking if $link matches glob $value\n";
625 if (match_glob($link, $value, @params)) {
626 return IkiWiki::SuccessReason->new("Data link on page $page with key $key matches glob $value: $link");
630 return IkiWiki::FailReason->new("No data link on page $page with key $key matches glob $value");