1 [[Tina]] has an updated [[plugins/osm]] that fixes some basic usages,
2 greatly simplifies the code, and would let us close
3 [[replace openlayers with leaflet]]
5 [[bugs/osm plugin fails to display map with javascript error]],
6 at the cost of removing some features.
8 The branch already incorporates changes from my review and additional fixes.
9 I'd appreciate additional careful review from another maintainer,
10 including about the points raised at [[plugins/osm/discussion]].
14 It has been over 2 years since I created this patch... I have even changed my name and gender in the meantime :)
15 Any chances of it being merged into master? At this point I am considering if it makes sense to keep using ikiwiki if I have to keep maintaining local patches for years.
19 >> Hi, I can understand your frustration with having outstanding patches for
20 >> review/merge. You aren't alone. It's clear that the IkiWiki maintainers are
21 >> overloaded at the moment. IkiWiki maintainers, is there anything that we can
24 >> In my case I started [collecting together stuff that I was requesting be merged](https://github.com/jmtd/ikiwiki/compare/3.20200202.3...jmtd:opinionated?expand=1)
25 >> into IkiWiki, by myself and others, in a branch that I use for the *Opinionated
26 >> Ikiwiki* [[container|containers]].
28 >> The *Opinionated IkiWiki* container was not intended to be a "clearing house"
29 >> for patches, as such, but it could potentially be a way for pending stuff to
30 >> get some exposure, which might increase the overburdened maintainers confidence
31 >> in the patches. (Would it)? Supposing that anyone is using the container of
34 >> I've personally not used the OSM plugin at all, but I took a quick look after
35 >> you posted the above message. It looks cool! I would probably accept a PR
36 >> against the "opinionated" branch in my fork, above, if that was of any interest.
38 >> -- *[[Jon]], 2021-08-18*