1 This is an idea from [[JoshTriplett]]. --[[Joey]]
3 Some uses of ikiwiki, such as for a bug-tracking system (BTS), move a bit away from the wiki end
4 of the spectrum, and toward storing structured data about a page or instead
7 For example, in a bug report you might want to choose a severity from a
8 list, enter a version number, and have a bug submitter or owner recorded,
9 etc. When editing online, it would be nice if these were separate fields on
10 the form, rather than the data being edited in the big edit form.
12 There's a tension here between remaining a wiki with human-editable source
13 files, containing freeform markup, and more structured data storage. I
14 think that it would be best to include the structured data in the page,
15 using a directive. Something like:
18 \[[data yaml="<arbitrary yaml here>"]]
21 As long as the position of the directive is not significant, it could be
22 stripped out when web editing, the yaml used to generate/populate form fields,
23 and then on save, the directive regenerated and inserted at top/bottom of
26 Josh thinks that yaml is probably a good choice, but the source could be a
27 `.yaml` file that contains no directives, and just yaml. An addition
28 complication in this scenario is, if the yaml included wiki page formatted content,
29 ikiwiki would have to guess or be told what markup language it used.
31 Either way, the yaml on the page would encode fields and their current content.
32 Information about data types would be encoded elsewhere, probably on a
33 parent page (using a separate directive). That way, all child pages could
34 be forced to have the same fields.
36 There would be some simple types like select, boolean, multiselect, string, wiki markup.
37 Probably lists of these (ie, list of strings). Possibly more complex data
40 It should also be possible for plugins to define new types, and the type
41 definitions should include validation of entered data, and how to prompt
42 the user for the data.
44 This seems conceptually straightforward, if possibly quite internally
45 complex to handle the more complicated types and validation.
47 One implementation wrinkle is how to build the html form. The editpage.tmpl
48 currently overrides the standard [[!cpan CGI::FormBuilder]] generated form,
49 which was done to make the edit page be laid out in a nice way. This,
50 however, means that new fields cannot be easily added to it using
51 [[!cpan CGI::FormBuilder]]. The attachment plugin uses the hack of bouilding
52 up html by hand and dumping it into the form via a template variable.
54 It would be nice if the type implementation code could just use
55 FormBuilder, since its automatic form generation, and nice field validation
56 model is a perfect match for structured data. But this problem with
57 editpage.tmpl would have to be sorted out to allow that.
61 * Pagespecs that can select pages with a field with a given value, etc.
62 This should use a pagespec function like field(fieldname, value). The
63 semantics of this will depend on the type of the field; text fields will
64 match value against the text, and link fields will check for a link
65 matching the pagespec value.
66 * The search plugin could allow searching for specific fields with specific
67 content. (xapian term search is a good fit).
71 [[tracking_bugs_with_dependencies]]
73 > I was also thinking about this for bug tracking. I'm not sure what
74 > sort of structured data is wanted in a page, so I decided to brainstorm
77 > * You just want the page to be pretty.
78 > * You want to access the data from another page. This would be almost like
79 > like a database lookup, or the OpenOffice Calc [VLookup](http://wiki.services.openoffice.org/wiki/Documentation/How_Tos/Calc:_VLOOKUP_function) function.
80 > * You want to make a pagespec depend upon the data. This could be used
81 > for dependancy tracking - you could match against pages listed as dependencies,
82 > rather than all pages linked from a given page.
84 >The first use case is handled by having a template in the page creation. You could
86 >have some type of form to edit the data, but that's just sugar on top of the template.
87 >If you were going to have a web form to edit the data, I can imagine a few ways to do it:
89 > * Have a special page type which gets compiled into the form. The page type would
90 > need to define the form as well as hold the stored data.
91 > * Have special directives that allow you to insert form elements into a normal page.
93 >I'm happy with template based page creation as a first pass...
95 >The second use case could be handled by a regular expression directive. eg:
97 > \[[regex spec="myBug" regex="Depends: ([^\s]+)"]]
99 > The directive would be replaced with the match from the regex on the 'myBug' page... or something.
101 >The third use case requires a pagespec function. One that matched a regex in the page might work.
102 >Otherwise, another option would be to annotate links with a type, and then check the type of links in
103 >a pagespec. e.g. you could have `depends` links and normal links.
105 >Anyway, I just wanted to list the thoughts. In none of these use cases is straight yaml or json the
106 >obvious answer. -- [[Will]]
108 >> Okie. I've had a play with this. A 'form' plugin is included inline below, but it is only a rough first pass to
109 >> get a feel for the design space.
111 >> The current design defines a new type of page - a 'form'. The type of page holds YAML data
112 >> defining a FormBuilder form. For example, if we add a file to the wiki source `test.form`:
117 comment: This is a test
121 >> The YAML content is a series of nested hashes. The outer hash is currently checked for two keys:
122 >> 'template', which specifies a parameter to pass to the FromBuilder as the template for the
123 >> form, and 'fields', which specifies the data for the fields on the form.
124 >> each 'field' is itself a hash. The keys and values are arguments to the formbuilder form method.
125 >> The most important one is 'value', which specifies the value of that field.
127 >> Using this, the plugin below can output a form when asked to generate HTML. The Formbuilder
128 >> arguments are sanitized (need a thorough security audit here - I'm sure I've missed a bunch of
129 >> holes). The form is generated with default values as supplied in the YAML data. It also has an
130 >> 'Update Form' button at the bottom.
132 >> The 'Update Form' button in the generated HTML submits changed values back to IkiWiki. The
133 >> plugin captures these new values, updates the YAML and writes it out again. The form is
134 >> validated when edited using this method. This method can only edit the values in the form.
135 >> You cannot add new fields this way.
137 >> It is still possible to edit the YAML directly using the 'edit' button. This allows adding new fields
138 >> to the form, or adding other formbuilder data to change how the form is displayed.
140 >> One final part of the plugin is a new pagespec function. `form_eq()` is a pagespec function that
141 >> takes two arguments (separated by a ','). The first argument is a field name, the second argument
142 >> a value for that field. The function matches forms (and not other page types) where the named
143 >> field exists and holds the value given in the second argument. For example:
145 \[[!inline pages="form_eq(age,15)" archive="yes"]]
147 >> will include a link to the page generated above.
149 >>> Okie, I've just made another plugin to try and do things in a different way.
150 >>> This approach adds a 'data' directive. There are two arguments, `key` and `value`.
151 >>> The directive is replaced by the value. There is also a match function, which is similar
152 >>> to the one above. It also takes two arguments, a key and a value. It returns true if the
153 >>> page has that key/value pair in a data directive. e.g.:
155 \[[!data key="age" value="15"]]
157 >>> then, in another page:
159 \[[!inline pages="data_eq(age,15)" archive="yes"]]
161 >>> I expect that we could have more match functions for each type of structured data,
162 >>> I just wanted to implement a rough prototype to get a feel for how it behaves. -- [[Will]]
164 >> Anyway, here are the plugins. As noted above these are only preliminary, exploratory, attempts. -- [[Will]]
166 >>>> I've just updated the second of the two patches below. The two patches are not mutually
167 >>>> exclusive, but I'm leaning towards the second as more useful (for the things I'm doing). -- [[Will]]
169 I think it's awesome that you're writing this code to explore the problem
170 space, [[Will]] -- and these plugins are good stabs at at least part of it.
171 Let me respond to a few of your comments.. --[[Joey]]
173 On use cases, one use case is a user posting a bug report with structured
174 data in it. A template is one way, but then the user has to deal with the
175 format used to store the structured data. This is where a edit-time form
178 > This was the idea with the 'form' plugin. With the 'data' plugin I was exploring
179 > a different approach: try to keep the markup simple enough that the user can edit
180 > the markup directly, and still have that be ok. I admit it is a stretch, but I thought
181 > it worth exploring.
183 Another use case is, after many such bugs have been filed,
184 wanting to add a new field to each bug report. To avoid needing to edit
185 every bug report it would be good if the fields in a bug report were
186 defined somewhere else, so that just that one place can be edited to add
187 the new field, and it will show up in each bug report (and in each bug
188 report's edit page, as a new form field).
190 > If I was going to do that, I'd use a perl script on a checked out
191 > workspace. I think you're describing a rare operation and
192 > so I'd be happy not having a web interface for it. Having said that,
193 > if you just wanted to change the form for *new* pages, then you
194 > can just edit the template used to create new pages.
196 Re the form plugin, I'm uncomfortable with tying things into
197 [[!cpan CGI::FormBuilder]] quite so tightly as you have.
199 > Yeah :). But I wanted to explore the space and that was the
200 > easiest way to start.
203 could easily change in a way that broke whole wikis full of pages. Also,
204 needing to sanitize FormBuilder fields with security implications is asking
205 for trouble, since new FormBuilder features could add new fields, or
206 add new features to existing fields (FormBuilder is very DWIM) that open
209 > There is a list of allowed fields. I only interpret those.
211 I think that having a type system, that allows defining specific types,
212 like "email address", by writing code (that in turn can use FormBuilder),
213 is a better approach, since it should avoid becoming a security problem.
215 > That would be possible. I think an extension to the 'data' plugin might
218 One specific security hole, BTW, is that if you allow the `validate` field,
219 FormBuilder will happily treat it as a regexp, and we don't want to expose
220 arbitrary perl regexps, since they can at least DOS a system, and can
221 probably be used to run arbitrary perl code.
223 > I validate the validate field :). It only allows validate fields that match
224 > `/^[\w\s]+$/`. This means you can really only use the pre-defined
225 > validation types in FormBuilder.
227 The data plugin only deals with a fairly small corner of the problem space,
228 but I think does a nice job at what it does. And could probably be useful
229 in a large number of other cases.
231 > I think the data plugin is more likely to be useful than the form plugin.
232 > I was thinking of extending the data directive by allowing an 'id' parameter.
233 > When you have an id parameter, then you can display a small form for that
234 > data element. The submission handler would look through the page source
235 > for the data directive with the right id parameter and edit it. This would
236 > make the data directive more like the current 'form' plugin.
238 > That is making things significantly more complex for less significant gain though. --[[Will]]
240 > Oh, one quick other note. The data plugin below was designed to handle multiple
241 > data elements in a single directive. e.g.
243 \[[!data key="Depends on" link="bugs/bugA" link="bugs/bugB" value=6]]
245 > would match `data_eq(Depends on,6)`, `data_link(Depends on,bugs/bugA)`, `data_link(Depends on,bugs/bugB)`
246 > or, if you applied the patch in [[todo/tracking_bugs_with_dependencies]] then you can use 'defined pagespecs'
247 > such as `data_link(Depends on,~openBugs)`. <a id="another_kind_of_links" />The ability to label links like this allows separation of
248 > dependencies between bugs from arbitrary links.
253 # Interpret YAML data to make a web form
254 package IkiWiki::Plugin::form;
258 use CGI::FormBuilder;
262 hook(type => "getsetup", id => "form", call => \&getsetup);
263 hook(type => "htmlize", id => "form", call => \&htmlize);
264 hook(type => "sessioncgi", id => "form", call => \&cgi_submit);
271 rebuild => 1, # format plugin
275 sub makeFormFromYAML ($$$) {
277 my $YAMLString = shift;
282 eval q{use CGI::FormBuilder};
285 my ($dataHashRef) = YAML::Load($YAMLString);
287 my @fields = keys %{ $dataHashRef->{fields} };
289 unshift(@fields, 'do');
290 unshift(@fields, 'page');
291 unshift(@fields, 'rcsinfo');
293 # print STDERR "Fields: @fields\n";
297 $submittedPage = $q->param('page') if defined $q;
299 if (defined $q && defined $submittedPage && ! ($submittedPage eq $page)) {
300 error("Submitted page doensn't match current page: $page, $submittedPage");
303 error("Page not backed by file") unless defined $pagesources{$page};
304 my $file = $pagesources{$page};
308 if (defined $dataHashRef->{template}) {
309 $template = $dataHashRef->{template};
311 $template = "form.tmpl";
314 my $form = CGI::FormBuilder->new(
318 required => [qw{page}],
320 action => $config{cgiurl},
321 template => scalar IkiWiki::template_params($template),
322 wikiname => $config{wikiname},
329 $form->field(name => 'do', value => 'Update Form', required => 1, force => 1, type => 'hidden');
330 $form->field(name => 'page', value => $page, required => 1, force => 1, type => 'hidden');
331 $form->field(name => 'rcsinfo', value => IkiWiki::rcs_prepedit($file), required => 1, force => 0, type => 'hidden');
334 foreach my $x (qw{label type multiple value fieldset growable message other required validate cleanopts columns comment disabled linebreaks class}) {
338 while ( my ($name, $data) = each(%{ $dataHashRef->{fields} }) ) {
339 next if $name eq 'page';
340 next if $name eq 'rcsinfo';
342 while ( my ($key, $value) = each(%{ $data }) ) {
343 next unless $validkey{$key};
344 next if $key eq 'validate' && !($value =~ /^[\w\s]+$/);
346 # print STDERR "Adding to field $name: $key => $value\n";
347 $form->field(name => $name, $key => $value);
351 # IkiWiki::decode_form_utf8($form);
358 my $content = $params{content};
359 my $page = $params{page};
361 my $form = makeFormFromYAML($page, $content, undef);
363 return $form->render(submit => 'Update Form');
366 sub cgi_submit ($$) {
370 my $do=$q->param('do');
371 return unless $do eq 'Update Form';
372 IkiWiki::decode_cgi_utf8($q);
376 eval q{use CGI::FormBuilder};
379 my $page = $q->param('page');
381 return unless exists $pagesources{$page};
383 return unless $pagesources{$page} =~ m/\.form$/ ;
385 return unless IkiWiki::check_canedit($page, $q, $session);
387 my $file = $pagesources{$page};
388 my $YAMLString = readfile(IkiWiki::srcfile($file));
389 my $form = makeFormFromYAML($page, $YAMLString, $q);
391 my ($dataHashRef) = YAML::Load($YAMLString);
393 if ($form->submitted eq 'Update Form' && $form->validate) {
395 #first update our data structure
397 while ( my ($name, $data) = each(%{ $dataHashRef->{fields} }) ) {
398 next if $name eq 'page';
399 next if $name eq 'rcs-data';
401 if (defined $q->param($name)) {
402 $data->{value} = $q->param($name);
406 # now write / commit the data
408 writefile($file, $config{srcdir}, YAML::Dump($dataHashRef));
410 my $message = "Web form submission";
412 IkiWiki::disable_commit_hook();
413 my $conflict=IkiWiki::rcs_commit($file, $message,
414 $form->field("rcsinfo"),
415 $session->param("name"), $ENV{REMOTE_ADDR});
416 IkiWiki::enable_commit_hook();
417 IkiWiki::rcs_update();
419 require IkiWiki::Render;
422 IkiWiki::redirect($q, "$config{url}/".htmlpage($page)."?updated");
425 error("Invalid data!");
431 package IkiWiki::PageSpec;
433 sub match_form_eq ($$;@) {
436 my @args=split(/,/, $argSet);
437 my $field=shift @args;
438 my $value=shift @args;
440 my $file = $IkiWiki::pagesources{$page};
442 if ($file !~ m/\.form$/) {
443 return IkiWiki::FailReason->new("page is not a form");
446 my $YAMLString = IkiWiki::readfile(IkiWiki::srcfile($file));
451 my ($dataHashRef) = YAML::Load($YAMLString);
453 if (! defined $dataHashRef->{fields}->{$field}) {
454 return IkiWiki::FailReason->new("field '$field' not defined in page");
457 my $formVal = $dataHashRef->{fields}->{$field}->{value};
459 if ($formVal eq $value) {
460 return IkiWiki::SuccessReason->new("field value matches");
462 return IkiWiki::FailReason->new("field value does not match");
471 # Allow data embedded in a page to be checked for
472 package IkiWiki::Plugin::data;
481 hook(type => "getsetup", id => "data", call => \&getsetup);
482 hook(type => "needsbuild", id => "data", call => \&needsbuild);
483 hook(type => "preprocess", id => "data", call => \&preprocess, scan => 1);
484 hook(type => "preprocess", id => "datatable", call => \&preprocess_table, scan => 1); # does this need scan?
491 rebuild => 1, # format plugin
496 my $needsbuild=shift;
497 foreach my $page (keys %pagestate) {
498 if (exists $pagestate{$page}{data}) {
499 if (exists $pagesources{$page} &&
500 grep { $_ eq $pagesources{$page} } @$needsbuild) {
501 # remove state, it will be re-added
502 # if the preprocessor directive is still
503 # there during the rebuild
504 delete $pagestate{$page}{data};
512 my %params=@argslist;
515 my $class = defined $params{class}
516 ? 'class="'.$params{class}.'"'
520 $html = "<th $class >$params{key}:</th><td $class >";
522 $html = "<span $class >$params{key}:";
525 while (scalar(@argslist) > 1) {
526 my $type = shift @argslist;
527 my $data = shift @argslist;
528 if ($type eq 'link') {
530 $pagestate{$params{page}}{data}{$params{key}}{link}{$data} = 1;
531 my $link=IkiWiki::linkpage($data);
532 add_depends($params{page}, $link);
533 $html .= ' ' . htmllink($params{page}, $params{destpage}, $link);
534 } elsif ($type eq 'data') {
535 $data = IkiWiki::preprocess($params{page}, $params{destpage},
536 IkiWiki::filter($params{page}, $params{destpage}, $data));
537 $html .= ' ' . $data;
538 # store data after processing - allows pagecounts to be stored, etc.
539 $pagestate{$params{page}}{data}{$params{key}}{data}{$data} = 1;
552 sub preprocess_table (@) {
556 push @lines, defined $params{class}
557 ? "<table class=\"".$params{class}.'">'
562 foreach my $line (split(/\n/, $params{datalist})) {
563 push @lines, "<tr>" . IkiWiki::preprocess($params{page}, $params{destpage},
564 IkiWiki::filter($params{page}, $params{destpage}, $line)) . "</tr>";
569 push @lines, '</table>';
571 return join("\n", @lines);
574 package IkiWiki::PageSpec;
576 sub match_data_eq ($$;@) {
579 my @args=split(/,/, $argSet);
581 my $value=shift @args;
583 if (! exists $IkiWiki::pagestate{$page}{data}) {
584 return IkiWiki::FailReason->new("page does not contain any data directives");
587 if (! exists $IkiWiki::pagestate{$page}{data}{$key}) {
588 return IkiWiki::FailReason->new("page does not contain data key '$key'");
591 if ($IkiWiki::pagestate{$page}{data}{$key}{data}{$value}) {
592 return IkiWiki::SuccessReason->new("value matches");
594 return IkiWiki::FailReason->new("value does not match");
598 sub match_data_link ($$;@) {
602 my @args=split(/,/, $argSet);
604 my $value=shift @args;
606 if (! exists $IkiWiki::pagestate{$page}{data}) {
607 return IkiWiki::FailReason->new("page $page does not contain any data directives and so cannot match a link");
610 if (! exists $IkiWiki::pagestate{$page}{data}{$key}) {
611 return IkiWiki::FailReason->new("page $page does not contain data key '$key'");
614 foreach my $link (keys %{ $IkiWiki::pagestate{$page}{data}{$key}{link} }) {
615 # print STDERR "Checking if $link matches glob $value\n";
616 if (match_glob($link, $value, @params)) {
617 return IkiWiki::SuccessReason->new("Data link on page $page with key $key matches glob $value: $link");
621 return IkiWiki::FailReason->new("No data link on page $page with key $key matches glob $value");