1 #+date: 2019-06-11 20:46:22 +0800
2 #+filetags: analytics leadership military fintech
3 #+title: Different spin to competing on analytics.
5 The May/June 2019 issue of Foreign Affairs contains an article by
6 Christian Brose, titled [[https://www.foreignaffairs.com/articles/2019-04-16/new-revolution-military-affairs]["The New Revolution in Military Affairs"]].
8 What struck me while reading the article is how much of an analogy can
9 be drawn between what is happening to businesses worldwide, and what the
10 author writes about the future in military technology and its trailing
11 adoption in the United States of America's military.
13 The transformation he describes is about the core process concerning
14 militaries, the so called "kill chain". Thanks to technological
15 advances, including artificial intelligence, that process can be
16 rapdidly accelerated, offering a competitive advantage to the owner of
19 Following quotes struck me in particular:
22 Instead of thinking systematically about buying faster, more effective
23 kill chains that could be built now, Washington poured money into newer
24 versions of old military platforms and prayed for technological miracles
30 The question, accordingly, is not how new technologies can improve the
31 U.S. military's ability to do what it already does but how they can
32 enable it to operate in new ways.
37 A military made up of small numbers of large, expensive, heavily manned,
38 and hard-to-replace systems will not survive on future battlefields,
39 where swarms of intelligent machines will deliver violence at a greater
40 volume and higher velocity than ever before. Success will require a
41 different kind of military, one built around large numbers of small,
42 inexpensive, expendable, and highly autonomous systems.
46 The same could be written about so many companies that haven't taken up
47 the strategy of competing on analytics.
49 Replacing the U.S. military with banking sector for instance, formerly
50 very profitable and seemingly unbeatable big banks have over the past
51 decade found their banking software to be too rigid. Instead of
52 investing in new products and services, they continued to rely on what
53 they had been doing for the prior hundred years. They invested in
54 upgrading their core systems, often with little payoff. While they were
55 doing that, small fintech firms appeared, excelling at just a small
56 fraction of what a bank considered its playing field. In those areas,
57 these new players innovated much more quickly, resulting in far more
58 efficient and effective service delivery.
60 At the core of many of these innovations lies data. The author likes
61 China's stockpiling of data as to that of oil, but the following quote
62 was particularly relevant in how it describes the use of that stockpile
63 of data to inform decisioning.
66 Every autonomous system will be able to process and make sense of the
67 information it gathers on its own, without relying on a command hub.
71 The analogy is clear - for years, organisations have been trying to
72 ensure they knew the "single source of truth". Tightly coupling all
73 business functions to a central ERP system was usually the answer. Just
74 like in the military, it can now often be better to have many small
75 functions be performed on the perifery of a company's systems, accepting
76 some duplication of data and directional accuracy to deliver quicker,
77 more cost-effective results - using expendable solutions. The challenges
78 to communicate effectively between these semi-autonomous systems are
81 Not insignificantly, the author poses "future militaries will be
82 distinguished by the quality of their software, especially their
83 artificial intelligence" - i.e. countries are competing on analytics,
84 also in the military sphere.
86 The article ends with some advise to government leadership - make the
87 transormation a priority, drive the change forward, recast cultures and
88 ensure correct incentives are in place.