From f787e88c3b4eee2ae53c0057da4d8b35dfd0200b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: "https://www.google.com/accounts/o8/id?id=AItOawkickHAzX_uVJMd_vFJjae6SLs2G38URPU" <Kalle@web> Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2015 18:07:19 -0400 Subject: [PATCH] should transients be autotagged witout rebuild --- doc/forum/Autotag_transient_pages.mdwn | 16 ++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 16 insertions(+) create mode 100644 doc/forum/Autotag_transient_pages.mdwn diff --git a/doc/forum/Autotag_transient_pages.mdwn b/doc/forum/Autotag_transient_pages.mdwn new file mode 100644 index 000000000..a172e88a4 --- /dev/null +++ b/doc/forum/Autotag_transient_pages.mdwn @@ -0,0 +1,16 @@ +During my adventures tweaking the album plugin to read image metadata I've +encountered some unexpected behaviour. My tweaks populate the [[tag]] from the +xmp:subject tag in the image and the file is written to the transient +underlay. + +The tag links get displayed properly but the /tag/* page isn't auto created +until I run a full --rebuild. Checked in pages appear to get instantly +autotagged and their tag pages created. + +There is some discussion about autotagging and transients on this site. But I +can't quite descipher what is supposed to be the expected behaviour. + +Anyone able to explain if the above scenario is as it should be? (for whatever +reason) --[[kjs]] + + -- 2.39.5