From f787e88c3b4eee2ae53c0057da4d8b35dfd0200b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: 
 "https://www.google.com/accounts/o8/id?id=AItOawkickHAzX_uVJMd_vFJjae6SLs2G38URPU"
 <Kalle@web>
Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2015 18:07:19 -0400
Subject: [PATCH] should transients be autotagged witout rebuild

---
 doc/forum/Autotag_transient_pages.mdwn | 16 ++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 16 insertions(+)
 create mode 100644 doc/forum/Autotag_transient_pages.mdwn

diff --git a/doc/forum/Autotag_transient_pages.mdwn b/doc/forum/Autotag_transient_pages.mdwn
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..a172e88a4
--- /dev/null
+++ b/doc/forum/Autotag_transient_pages.mdwn
@@ -0,0 +1,16 @@
+During my adventures tweaking the album plugin to read image metadata I've
+encountered some unexpected behaviour. My tweaks populate the [[tag]] from the
+xmp:subject tag in the image and the file is written to the transient
+underlay. 
+
+The tag links get displayed properly but the /tag/* page isn't auto created
+until I run a full --rebuild. Checked in pages appear to get instantly
+autotagged and their tag pages created.
+
+There is some discussion about autotagging and transients on this site. But I
+can't quite descipher what is supposed to be the expected behaviour.
+
+Anyone able to explain if the above scenario is as it should be? (for whatever
+reason) --[[kjs]]
+
+
-- 
2.39.5