From da947bea4be8b388531ff70650d274f8ee8f1500 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Joey Hess Date: Sun, 21 Dec 2008 01:41:00 -0500 Subject: [PATCH 1/1] analysis --- doc/bugs/inline_sort_order_and_meta_date_value.mdwn | 10 ++++++++++ 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+) diff --git a/doc/bugs/inline_sort_order_and_meta_date_value.mdwn b/doc/bugs/inline_sort_order_and_meta_date_value.mdwn index f5f4ea484..219657753 100644 --- a/doc/bugs/inline_sort_order_and_meta_date_value.mdwn +++ b/doc/bugs/inline_sort_order_and_meta_date_value.mdwn @@ -300,3 +300,13 @@ mtime and ctime" are not ones that I know how to follow (given that touch sets > } > > --[David A. Harding](http://dtrt.org/), 2008-12-20 + +Thank you for a textbook excellent reproduction recipe. + +What appears to be going on here is that meta directives are not processed +until the leaf pages are rendered, and thus the ctime setting is not +available at the time that they are inlined, and the newer unix ctime is +used. On the second build, the meta data has already been recorded. + +This can probably be avoided by processing meta date at scan time. +--[[Joey]] -- 2.39.2