From d3dbb70fabe3cce3cda21a567eec62fc58f73ef5 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: "https://www.google.com/accounts/o8/id?id=AItOawlqWSY9PNYRysA9vrU-JiQh7-s7q6SOcIE" Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2012 17:14:31 -0400 Subject: [PATCH 1/1] Respond to "proper patch" request from Joey (i.e. apology) --- ...llow_TMPL__95__LOOP_in_template_directives.mdwn | 14 ++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+) diff --git a/doc/todo/allow_TMPL__95__LOOP_in_template_directives.mdwn b/doc/todo/allow_TMPL__95__LOOP_in_template_directives.mdwn index 6d0bd0971..890c4cf4b 100644 --- a/doc/todo/allow_TMPL__95__LOOP_in_template_directives.mdwn +++ b/doc/todo/allow_TMPL__95__LOOP_in_template_directives.mdwn @@ -14,6 +14,20 @@ rather limited way. > the form of a patch that is reviewable, not a gratuitous rewrite. > --[[Joey]] +>> Yes, my apologies for that. The two worker functions `mktmpl_hash` +and `proc_tmpl_hash` are new. The `preprocess` function then starts +by arranging the parameters into an array. This array is passed to the +`mktmpl_hash` and it creates a hash, suitable for passing into the +HTML::Template directly. The `proc_tmpl_hash` then walks the hash +structure and processes the parameters. + +>> I know ... you weren't looking for an explanation, just a patch +... totally understand. Point I'm trying to make, it's a 90% re-write +anyway (and my `style(8)` will probably piss most people off). + +>> Anyway, would love to contribute so will try to get to doing this +"correctly" and post as a patch. + I would, personally, only use this feature for very basic loops and, although nested loops *might* be possible (with a little more tinkering) it think any attempt would be better served by -- 2.39.5