From bcfda0e56190af5ddd2ddc2e134f71951933e642 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: "http://smcv.pseudorandom.co.uk/" Date: Thu, 26 Sep 2013 09:11:56 -0400 Subject: [PATCH 1/1] Added a comment --- ...1_ea4faa2b5bb9216c0a0427f2071584ef._comment | 18 ++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 18 insertions(+) create mode 100644 doc/forum/ikiwiki_with_album___38___underlay_plugins/comment_1_ea4faa2b5bb9216c0a0427f2071584ef._comment diff --git a/doc/forum/ikiwiki_with_album___38___underlay_plugins/comment_1_ea4faa2b5bb9216c0a0427f2071584ef._comment b/doc/forum/ikiwiki_with_album___38___underlay_plugins/comment_1_ea4faa2b5bb9216c0a0427f2071584ef._comment new file mode 100644 index 000000000..355901617 --- /dev/null +++ b/doc/forum/ikiwiki_with_album___38___underlay_plugins/comment_1_ea4faa2b5bb9216c0a0427f2071584ef._comment @@ -0,0 +1,18 @@ +[[!comment format=mdwn + username="http://smcv.pseudorandom.co.uk/" + nickname="smcv" + subject="comment 1" + date="2013-09-26T13:11:55Z" + content=""" +\"I guess the plugins have to setup and upload to underlaydir somehow\" - +yes, the hypothetical specialized CGI interface mentioned at the end of +[[plugins/contrib/album]] would ideally be able to do that. + +I'd also like to be able to keep full-resolution photos on my laptop +but mangle them down to a more web-compatible resolution in a +separate underlay that is what actually gets uploaded, also as described +on that page - but that doesn't make a great deal of sense for a +non-CGI workflow, since if you're uploading full-resolution photos to +the CGI, you've already done the big data transfer whether you +intended to or not :-) +"""]] -- 2.39.5