From a4cedcc96d65d8d12ddb08e44f0a14cdc78c66c3 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: jcflack Date: Sun, 14 Sep 2014 18:34:13 -0400 Subject: [PATCH] --- ...sn__39__t_store_PERL5LIB_environment_variable.mdwn | 11 +++++++++++ 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+) diff --git a/doc/bugs/CGI_wrapper_doesn__39__t_store_PERL5LIB_environment_variable.mdwn b/doc/bugs/CGI_wrapper_doesn__39__t_store_PERL5LIB_environment_variable.mdwn index 9da25157f..a60fe130f 100644 --- a/doc/bugs/CGI_wrapper_doesn__39__t_store_PERL5LIB_environment_variable.mdwn +++ b/doc/bugs/CGI_wrapper_doesn__39__t_store_PERL5LIB_environment_variable.mdwn @@ -52,3 +52,14 @@ As I am not sure that remembering `PERL5LIB` is a good idea, I think that a pret > in having it in the storable too? > > --[[smcv]] + +Happy to make the escaping change, thanks for the sharp eye. + +My thinking on `delete` is once it's handled, it's handled. The C code +is going to put this straight into the real environment and then do +a simple `exec` ... is there any way this hasn't been handled? + +It just takes up space twice in the generated wrapper otherwise. +Admittedly it's not much space, but seems to be even less point ... ? + +-- Chap -- 2.39.2