From 9d2258379b7c705901bc8a2697eb0c9440bcbcff Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: "http://jmtd.livejournal.com/" Date: Sat, 4 Jun 2011 09:01:08 +0000 Subject: [PATCH] response --- .../Comments_are_not_sorted_by_their_date_attribute.mdwn | 9 +++++++++ 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+) diff --git a/doc/bugs/Comments_are_not_sorted_by_their_date_attribute.mdwn b/doc/bugs/Comments_are_not_sorted_by_their_date_attribute.mdwn index 3268f9983..23ddc01b6 100644 --- a/doc/bugs/Comments_are_not_sorted_by_their_date_attribute.mdwn +++ b/doc/bugs/Comments_are_not_sorted_by_their_date_attribute.mdwn @@ -25,3 +25,12 @@ The presentation of the resulting comments is not sorted by this date, which I w > adding a new [[pagespec/sorting]] method that sorts by filename, > rather than by title, and using it by default for comments might be > better than the current situation. --[[Joey]] + +>> Since git does not track file time, I tend to prefer to encode date +>> stuff inside files where possible. For other pages, I put an explicit +>> [[plugins/meta]] date into the source when I create the page. I've +>> had to reconstruct ordering after moving to a different git checkout +>> after a server move before, it was painful ☺ +>> +>> In my current situation, I could live with by-filename ordering. By-title +>> ordering would also be workable. — [[Jon]] -- 2.39.2