From 7a22ead98ebe231943a9e1a1873640c372f25077 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Joey Hess Date: Mon, 8 Jun 2009 21:25:17 -0400 Subject: [PATCH] update --- doc/forum/is_it_possible_to_NOT_add_openid2_meta_tags.mdwn | 6 ++++++ 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+) diff --git a/doc/forum/is_it_possible_to_NOT_add_openid2_meta_tags.mdwn b/doc/forum/is_it_possible_to_NOT_add_openid2_meta_tags.mdwn index 1a6d01cd3..a364449f9 100644 --- a/doc/forum/is_it_possible_to_NOT_add_openid2_meta_tags.mdwn +++ b/doc/forum/is_it_possible_to_NOT_add_openid2_meta_tags.mdwn @@ -47,3 +47,9 @@ lays with the consumers not falling back to the openid1 tags when they are openi > consumers seem justified in not falling back (guess; I don't know the 2.0 spec). > The only way this seems fixable is to add an option to meta to allow disabling openid 2. Which > should be easy enough to do. --[[Joey]] + +>> Actually, it seems that identi.ca / certifi.ca do +>> not interoperate when using openid2. It actually +>> fails half the time, and succeeds half the time; +>> seems to be picking openid1 and openid2 randomly and failing +>> on the latter. --[[Joey]] -- 2.39.2