From 6f8632184ebc66154c9280aff3b84041d056d52e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: "http://www.cse.unsw.edu.au/~willu/" Date: Sat, 23 Aug 2008 03:32:33 -0400 Subject: [PATCH] Further thinking --- doc/todo/tracking_bugs_with_dependencies.mdwn | 7 +++++++ 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+) diff --git a/doc/todo/tracking_bugs_with_dependencies.mdwn b/doc/todo/tracking_bugs_with_dependencies.mdwn index 83d4261e3..bdc085785 100644 --- a/doc/todo/tracking_bugs_with_dependencies.mdwn +++ b/doc/todo/tracking_bugs_with_dependencies.mdwn @@ -36,3 +36,10 @@ I like the idea of [[tips/integrated_issue_tracking_with_ikiwiki]], and I do so > Does that seem like a reasonable first approach? > > -- [[Will]] + +> One quick further thought. All the above discussion assumes that 'dependency' is the +> same as 'links to', which is not really true. For example, you'd like to be able to say +> "This bug does not depend upon [ [ link to other bug ] ]" and not have a dependency. +> Without having different types of links, I don't see how this would be possible. +> +> -- [[Will]] -- 2.39.5