From 66fa5826f35aaa2b609bb86f67c3df887bad1e09 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: "http://smcv.pseudorandom.co.uk/" <smcv@web>
Date: Fri, 6 Apr 2012 12:27:17 -0400
Subject: [PATCH] a branch to change pagenames semantics exists

---
 ..._pages_in_inline_pagenames_do_not_add_a_dependency.mdwn | 7 +++++++
 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+)

diff --git a/doc/bugs/nonexistent_pages_in_inline_pagenames_do_not_add_a_dependency.mdwn b/doc/bugs/nonexistent_pages_in_inline_pagenames_do_not_add_a_dependency.mdwn
index c2f560e64..70b06a951 100644
--- a/doc/bugs/nonexistent_pages_in_inline_pagenames_do_not_add_a_dependency.mdwn
+++ b/doc/bugs/nonexistent_pages_in_inline_pagenames_do_not_add_a_dependency.mdwn
@@ -33,3 +33,10 @@ I think the presence dependency is probably the cleanest approach?
 
 > I think it was possibly a mistake to use wikilink style lookup for
 > `pagenames`. --[[Joey]]
+
+[[!tag patch]] [[!template id=gitbranch branch=smcv/literal-pagenames author="[[smcv]]"]]
+>> I used the linking rules to make references to
+>> "nearby" pages convenient, but if you'd prefer "absolute"
+>> semantics, my `ready/literal-pagenames` branch does that. For
+>> my main use-case for `pagenames` ([[plugins/contrib/album]])
+>> it's fine either way. --[[smcv]]
-- 
2.39.5