From 62483fe5cac6b420d8855b33a06c5dac1f4b2dd9 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: "https://id.koumbit.net/anarcat" Date: Wed, 13 Nov 2013 19:51:03 -0400 Subject: [PATCH] related ideas --- doc/todo/fastcgi_or_modperl_installation_instructions.mdwn | 2 ++ 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+) diff --git a/doc/todo/fastcgi_or_modperl_installation_instructions.mdwn b/doc/todo/fastcgi_or_modperl_installation_instructions.mdwn index ad7910956..8850d87f1 100644 --- a/doc/todo/fastcgi_or_modperl_installation_instructions.mdwn +++ b/doc/todo/fastcgi_or_modperl_installation_instructions.mdwn @@ -14,5 +14,7 @@ There has got to be a way to run the CGI wrapper under fastcgi or modperl (apach > > Otherwise the general idea would be to launch a daemon per site that would have a pool of fastcgi processes to answer requests. The common setup pattern here is that users have a fixed quota of processes running as their user, listening either on the network (hackish: a port need to be allocated for each user) or on a socket (documented above, but then the webserver needs write access). > > > > Perl has had extensive support for FastCGI for quite a while. It seems to me a simple daemon could be written to wrap around the `.cgi`, it's a common way things are deployed. [RT](http://rt.bestpractical.com/) for example can run as a regular CGI, under `mod_perl` or `FastCGI` indiscrimenatly, the latter being more reliable and faster. They use [Plack](http://search.cpan.org/dist/Plack/) to setup that server (see the [startup script](https://github.com/bestpractical/rt/blob/stable/sbin/rt-server.in) for an example). But of course, [TIMTOWTDI](http://search.cpan.org/search?query=fastcgi&mode=all). --[[anarcat]] +> > +> > Also related: [[todo/multi-thread_ikiwiki]], [[todo/rewrite_ikiwiki_in_haskell]]. :) --[[anarcat]] [[!tag wishlist]] -- 2.39.5