From 5bc7a30f6435bfc34a0311a75c5f199e542c85cd Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: smcv Date: Tue, 21 Feb 2017 14:21:19 -0400 Subject: [PATCH] Added a comment --- ...omment_8_b7cbce4cfea17c2bbd28f6f450deff9a._comment | 11 +++++++++++ 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+) create mode 100644 doc/forum/Inconsistency_in_pages_behaviour/comment_8_b7cbce4cfea17c2bbd28f6f450deff9a._comment diff --git a/doc/forum/Inconsistency_in_pages_behaviour/comment_8_b7cbce4cfea17c2bbd28f6f450deff9a._comment b/doc/forum/Inconsistency_in_pages_behaviour/comment_8_b7cbce4cfea17c2bbd28f6f450deff9a._comment new file mode 100644 index 000000000..2faacf189 --- /dev/null +++ b/doc/forum/Inconsistency_in_pages_behaviour/comment_8_b7cbce4cfea17c2bbd28f6f450deff9a._comment @@ -0,0 +1,11 @@ +[[!comment format=mdwn + username="smcv" + avatar="http://cdn.libravatar.org/avatar/0ee943fe632ff995f6f0f25b7167d03b" + subject="comment 8" + date="2017-02-21T18:21:19Z" + content=""" +> Is .po plugin able to work if the user chooses to use foo/index.mdwn ? + +Discussion on [[plugins/po/discussion]] in 2009, before the (then third party) +po plugin was merged, says it is known not to work in that configuration. +"""]] -- 2.39.5