From 4f8d45bfde9c031f63d191909bb3dfe684b814e1 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: "https://id.koumbit.net/anarcat" Date: Mon, 29 Aug 2016 23:44:59 -0400 Subject: [PATCH] some response --- .../Track_Markdown_Standardisation_Efforts.mdwn | 16 ++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 16 insertions(+) diff --git a/doc/todo/Track_Markdown_Standardisation_Efforts.mdwn b/doc/todo/Track_Markdown_Standardisation_Efforts.mdwn index 7ab4e0f7d..545098eda 100644 --- a/doc/todo/Track_Markdown_Standardisation_Efforts.mdwn +++ b/doc/todo/Track_Markdown_Standardisation_Efforts.mdwn @@ -16,3 +16,19 @@ It might be worth following... > Markdown unless someone either changes the behaviour of Discount, > or recommends a different (and hopefully better) third-party library. > --[[smcv]] + +> I am not sure the noise is so much "recent" anymore: that article +> announcing Commonmark is from 2012 and markdown.github.com is from +> around 2014. +> +> Presumably, Commonmark will become official in 2016, but you know what +> they say about standards: +> +> I guess the only thing that Ikiwiki would need to do would be to +> somewhat support Commonmark. There's a Perl library that wraps the C +> library here: https://metacpan.org/release/CommonMark +> +> I guess we would need to test how it performs and compares with +> Discount, but having it as a third party module is up for anyone's +> grab. It should be a fairly simple implementation after all... +> --[[anarcat]] -- 2.39.2