From 4d355918f0ee478c63084661e617ba44ddc360bb Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: "jon+ikiwiki@663db4cb26e845748f3e7e6d51eeb26c6014f1c3" Date: Thu, 22 Feb 2018 12:30:42 -0400 Subject: [PATCH] Added a comment --- .../comment_1_db32786dd1c1022cec983a12a30b2b17._comment | 9 +++++++++ 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+) create mode 100644 doc/forum/Some_thoughts_about_Ikiwiki/comment_1_db32786dd1c1022cec983a12a30b2b17._comment diff --git a/doc/forum/Some_thoughts_about_Ikiwiki/comment_1_db32786dd1c1022cec983a12a30b2b17._comment b/doc/forum/Some_thoughts_about_Ikiwiki/comment_1_db32786dd1c1022cec983a12a30b2b17._comment new file mode 100644 index 000000000..524ca09c3 --- /dev/null +++ b/doc/forum/Some_thoughts_about_Ikiwiki/comment_1_db32786dd1c1022cec983a12a30b2b17._comment @@ -0,0 +1,9 @@ +[[!comment format=mdwn + username="jon+ikiwiki@663db4cb26e845748f3e7e6d51eeb26c6014f1c3" + nickname="jon+ikiwiki" + avatar="http://cdn.libravatar.org/avatar/2a3bcb34947fceef61560bd8a2931957" + subject="comment 1" + date="2018-02-22T16:30:42Z" + content=""" +I have basically been on a similar journey recently. Honestly I would like to move on from IkiWiki myself, and I agree with most of your first points (except the OOP one, which I think is a red herring). I haven't done a deep evaluation of other static site generators, just a shallow one; but I haven't looked at only Python. But results across other languages are much the same. A few core concepts in IkiWiki are very *right*, IMHO: the pagespec/wikilink rules amongst them. -- [[Jon]] +"""]] -- 2.39.2