From 4b21b29dae141330563a64dec7d686d514243c82 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: "http://smcv.pseudorandom.co.uk/" Date: Fri, 7 Jan 2011 20:37:54 +0000 Subject: [PATCH] updated (many) branches --- doc/todo/transient_pages.mdwn | 22 +++++++++++++++++++++- 1 file changed, 21 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/doc/todo/transient_pages.mdwn b/doc/todo/transient_pages.mdwn index 1a35dddb1..f86857e6a 100644 --- a/doc/todo/transient_pages.mdwn +++ b/doc/todo/transient_pages.mdwn @@ -23,7 +23,8 @@ It could also be used for an [[todo/alias_directive]]. [[!template id=gitbranch branch=smcv/ready/transient author="[[smcv]]"]] [[!template id=gitbranch branch=smcv/ready/transient-recentchanges author="[[smcv]]"]] -[[!template id=gitbranch branch=smcv/ready/transient-tag author="[[smcv]]"]] +[[!template id=gitbranch branch=smcv/ready/tag-test author="[[smcv]]"]] +[[!template id=gitbranch branch=smcv/transient-tag author="[[smcv]]"]] [[!tag patch]] I think this branch is now enough to be useful. It adds the following: @@ -197,6 +198,22 @@ Not done yet (in that branch, at least): >> >> it for those simple cases then? (demand-calculate wikistatedir) >> >> --[[Joey]] +>> >>> The reason that transientdir needs to be absolute is that it's +>> >>> added as an underlay. +>> >>> +>> >>> We could avoid using `Cwd` by taking the extra commit from either +>> >>> `smcv/transient-relative` or `smcv/transient-relative-api`; +>> >>> your choice. I'd personally go for the latter. +>> >>> +>> >>> According to git grep, [[plugins/po]] already wants to look at +>> >>> the underlaydirs in its checkconfig hook, so I don't think +>> >>> delaying calculation of the underlaydir is viable. (I also noticed +>> >>> a bug, +>> >>> [[bugs/po:_might_not_add_translated_versions_of_all_underlays]].) +>> >>> +>> >>> `underlaydirs` certainly needs to have been calculated by the +>> >>> time `refresh` hooks finish, so `find_src_files` can use it. --s + >> * Unsure about the use of `default_pageext` in the `change` >> hook. Is everything in the transientdir really going >> to use that pageext? Would it be better to look up the @@ -217,6 +234,9 @@ Not done yet (in that branch, at least): >> >> transient page has the same extension as its replacement? >> >> --[[Joey]] +>> >>> Good idea, that'll be true for web edits at least. +>> >>> Commit added. --s + -------------------------- ## An earlier version -- 2.39.5