From 4a67f6130fe9e85140cc26cc2a6ba928277db51e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Jonathan Dowland Date: Wed, 18 Aug 2021 11:54:59 +0100 Subject: [PATCH] single-indent (not sure why I doubled it) --- doc/todo/merge_tina-osm_branch.mdwn | 40 ++++++++++++++--------------- 1 file changed, 20 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-) diff --git a/doc/todo/merge_tina-osm_branch.mdwn b/doc/todo/merge_tina-osm_branch.mdwn index 325139407..3cdbca662 100644 --- a/doc/todo/merge_tina-osm_branch.mdwn +++ b/doc/todo/merge_tina-osm_branch.mdwn @@ -16,23 +16,23 @@ Any chances of it being merged into master? At this point I am considering if it --[[Tina]] ->> Hi, I can understand your frustration with having outstanding patches for ->> review/merge. You aren't alone. It's clear that the IkiWiki maintainers are ->> overloaded at the moment. IkiWiki maintainers, is there anything that we can ->> do to help? ->> ->> In my case I started [collecting together stuff that I was requesting be merged](https://github.com/jmtd/ikiwiki/compare/3.20200202.3...jmtd:opinionated?expand=1) ->> into IkiWiki, by myself and others, in a branch that I use for the *Opinionated ->> Ikiwiki* [[container|containers]]. ->> ->> The *Opinionated IkiWiki* container was not intended to be a "clearing house" ->> for patches, as such, but it could potentially be a way for pending stuff to ->> get some exposure, which might increase the overburdened maintainers confidence ->> in the patches. (Would it)? Supposing that anyone is using the container of ->> course. ->> ->> I've personally not used the OSM plugin at all, but I took a quick look after ->> you posted the above message. It looks cool! I would probably accept a PR ->> against the "opinionated" branch in my fork, above, if that was of any interest. ->> ->> -- *[[Jon]], 2021-08-18* +> Hi, I can understand your frustration with having outstanding patches for +> review/merge. You aren't alone. It's clear that the IkiWiki maintainers are +> overloaded at the moment. IkiWiki maintainers, is there anything that we can +> do to help? +> +> In my case I started [collecting together stuff that I was requesting be merged](https://github.com/jmtd/ikiwiki/compare/3.20200202.3...jmtd:opinionated?expand=1) +> into IkiWiki, by myself and others, in a branch that I use for the *Opinionated +> Ikiwiki* [[container|containers]]. +> +> The *Opinionated IkiWiki* container was not intended to be a "clearing house" +> for patches, as such, but it could potentially be a way for pending stuff to +> get some exposure, which might increase the overburdened maintainers confidence +> in the patches. (Would it)? Supposing that anyone is using the container of +> course. +> +> I've personally not used the OSM plugin at all, but I took a quick look after +> you posted the above message. It looks cool! I would probably accept a PR +> against the "opinionated" branch in my fork, above, if that was of any interest. +> +> -- *[[Jon]], 2021-08-18* -- 2.39.2