From 4481b2cc66f291da6ec310595a6706947f1b3f81 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: joey <joey@0fa5a96a-9a0e-0410-b3b2-a0fd24251071>
Date: Thu, 8 Feb 2007 14:02:30 +0000
Subject: [PATCH] web commit by hb

---
 doc/patchqueue/inline_-_sort_by_old_first.mdwn | 2 ++
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)

diff --git a/doc/patchqueue/inline_-_sort_by_old_first.mdwn b/doc/patchqueue/inline_-_sort_by_old_first.mdwn
index 879acb866..9054beadc 100644
--- a/doc/patchqueue/inline_-_sort_by_old_first.mdwn
+++ b/doc/patchqueue/inline_-_sort_by_old_first.mdwn
@@ -21,6 +21,8 @@ this patch adds a new type of sort "old".
 > the "age" lines just above them. It's identical; age already does what
 > you want. --[[Joey]]
 
+>> Well, $b and $a are switched in 'old' comparing to 'age'... According to the documentation, *The default, "age" is to sort newest pages first*. I just want the reverse, and that's why I just switched the $a and $b args of the sort func.... --HB
+
 However, I wonder if it would be better to add another option for inline like "sortorder" with "desc" or "asc" keywords ?
 
 > That might be cleaner, since it would allow sorting pages in reverse by
-- 
2.39.5