From 3f9dd729b3f89c25689bb96d55d71d3eb232951f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Joey Hess Date: Mon, 8 Jun 2009 20:53:23 -0400 Subject: [PATCH] resp --- .../is_it_possible_to_NOT_add_openid2_meta_tags.mdwn | 8 +++++--- 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/doc/forum/is_it_possible_to_NOT_add_openid2_meta_tags.mdwn b/doc/forum/is_it_possible_to_NOT_add_openid2_meta_tags.mdwn index 7129563ab..1a6d01cd3 100644 --- a/doc/forum/is_it_possible_to_NOT_add_openid2_meta_tags.mdwn +++ b/doc/forum/is_it_possible_to_NOT_add_openid2_meta_tags.mdwn @@ -42,6 +42,8 @@ It seems that since I have moved my site to its final location and made it live I do not have a proper understanding of the inner workings of openid so not exactly sure what part is failing but I think the problem lays with the consumers not falling back to the openid1 tags when they are openid1 only consumers. --[Mick](http://www.lunix.com.au) - - - +> So, just to clarify, certifi.ca works ok (I verified this, logging into identi.ca using it). +> You had the problem running your own openid provider which did not support 2.0, in which case, +> consumers seem justified in not falling back (guess; I don't know the 2.0 spec). +> The only way this seems fixable is to add an option to meta to allow disabling openid 2. Which +> should be easy enough to do. --[[Joey]] -- 2.39.2