From 2693d2e51868c18a03c978825d6989d6bb0ea322 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: smcv Date: Mon, 30 Nov 2015 17:46:55 -0400 Subject: [PATCH] it's either GPL-2+ or very permissive; copyright holder should clarify --- doc/bugs/Please_add_copyright_notice_in_embedded_JS.mdwn | 9 +++++++++ 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+) diff --git a/doc/bugs/Please_add_copyright_notice_in_embedded_JS.mdwn b/doc/bugs/Please_add_copyright_notice_in_embedded_JS.mdwn index b22417031..b01957de4 100644 --- a/doc/bugs/Please_add_copyright_notice_in_embedded_JS.mdwn +++ b/doc/bugs/Please_add_copyright_notice_in_embedded_JS.mdwn @@ -3,3 +3,12 @@ Hello, We got a report that http://www.gnu.org/software/hurd/ "embeds apparently non-free JS". This is because the embedded ikiwiki.js javascript file does not wear a copyright notice, to tell which licence this file is shipped under. Could you add such a copyright notice? Thanks + +> Everything in ikiwiki is [[freesoftware]]. The JavaScript in `underlays/javascript` +> appears to be GPL-2+, but might have been intended to be under the permissive basewiki +> license. +> +> [[Joey]] appears to be the only author, so is presumably the only copyright +> holder; nobody else can give an authoritative answer about the JS's license. Joey, +> if you want `underlays/javascript` to be permissively-licensed, please amend +> `debian/copyright` accordingly. --[[smcv]] -- 2.39.2