From 0d947d38513cbfd32f76b2245cb8583237e96678 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: "http://smcv.pseudorandom.co.uk/" <smcv@web>
Date: Sun, 27 Nov 2011 10:15:34 -0400
Subject: [PATCH 1/1] branch implementing my keyword suggestion

---
 doc/bugs/octal_umask_setting_is_unintuitive.mdwn | 3 +++
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)

diff --git a/doc/bugs/octal_umask_setting_is_unintuitive.mdwn b/doc/bugs/octal_umask_setting_is_unintuitive.mdwn
index 0a63940ce..f6e5a9a4d 100644
--- a/doc/bugs/octal_umask_setting_is_unintuitive.mdwn
+++ b/doc/bugs/octal_umask_setting_is_unintuitive.mdwn
@@ -28,6 +28,9 @@ you have to use one of
 
 and if you try to say 022 you'll get 22 decimal = 026 octal.
 
+[[!tag patch]]
+[[!template id=gitbranch branch=smcv/umask-keywords author="[[smcv]]"]]
+
 Perhaps the best way to solve this would be to have keywords
 for the few values of `umask` that are actually useful?
 
-- 
2.39.5