From: http://www.cse.unsw.edu.au/~willu/ <http://www.cse.unsw.edu.au/~willu/@web>
Date: Fri, 22 May 2009 04:43:45 +0000 (-0400)
Subject: response
X-Git-Tag: 3.13~5^2~3
X-Git-Url: http://git.vanrenterghem.biz/git.ikiwiki.info.git/commitdiff_plain/9b5bf6ff85d7e738317aa87b68581082d9542394

response
---

diff --git a/doc/todo/tracking_bugs_with_dependencies.mdwn b/doc/todo/tracking_bugs_with_dependencies.mdwn
index 8268e4026..84b2448a6 100644
--- a/doc/todo/tracking_bugs_with_dependencies.mdwn
+++ b/doc/todo/tracking_bugs_with_dependencies.mdwn
@@ -277,6 +277,19 @@ account all comments above (which doesn't mean it is above reproach :) ).  --[[W
 >>> because the link target it is being asked to check for is a single
 >>> page name, not a glob.
 
+>>>> A named pagespec should fall into the glob case.  These two pagespecs should be the same:
+
+    link(a*)
+
+>>>> and
+
+    define(aStar, a*) and link(aStar)
+
+>>>> In the first case, we want the pagespec to match any page that links to a page matching the glob.
+>>>> In the second case, we want the pagespec to match any page that links to a page matching the named spec.
+>>>> match_link() was already doing existential part.  The patches to this code were simply to remove the `lc()`
+>>>> call from the named pagespec name.  Can that `lc` be removed entirely? -- [[Will]]
+
 > * Generally, the need to modify `match_*` functions so that they
 >   check for and handle named pagespecs seems suboptimal, if
 >   only because there might be others people may want to use named