From: Colin_Morey <Colin_Morey@web>
Date: Fri, 12 Aug 2011 09:35:25 +0000 (-0400)
Subject: (no commit message)
X-Git-Tag: 3.20110905~66
X-Git-Url: http://git.vanrenterghem.biz/git.ikiwiki.info.git/commitdiff_plain/86a2e6524cf69c472736d4761bf002f8d211b4b4

---

diff --git a/doc/bugs/ikiwiki_cgi_fails_to_build_on_Solaris_due_to_missing_LOCK__95__EX.mdwn b/doc/bugs/ikiwiki_cgi_fails_to_build_on_Solaris_due_to_missing_LOCK__95__EX.mdwn
index 6286d6893..2913bfb53 100644
--- a/doc/bugs/ikiwiki_cgi_fails_to_build_on_Solaris_due_to_missing_LOCK__95__EX.mdwn
+++ b/doc/bugs/ikiwiki_cgi_fails_to_build_on_Solaris_due_to_missing_LOCK__95__EX.mdwn
@@ -13,3 +13,19 @@ cc: Sun C 5.9 SunOS_i386 Patch 124868-01 2007/07/12
 
 
 I don't know enough C to provide a patch, but from googling it, people seem to be suggesting fcntl has an alternative.
+
+
+-----
+
+
+changing
+
+    if (lockfd != -1 && flock(lockfd, LOCK_EX) == 0) {
+   
+
+to read
+
+    if (lockfd != -1 && lockf(lockfd, F_LOCK,0) == 0) {
+
+
+in IkiWiki/Wrapper.pm  lets it compile, according to http://man-wiki.net/index.php/3:lockf "On  Linux, this call is just an interface for fcntl(2)"  does this seem like a sensible fix?