From: chrysn Date: Sat, 5 Jul 2014 14:42:32 +0000 (+0200) Subject: comment on autoindex branch X-Git-Tag: debian/3.20140815~28^2~20 X-Git-Url: http://git.vanrenterghem.biz/git.ikiwiki.info.git/commitdiff_plain/6eb89492f7b98003227fddeea6bb03d0f36b5d88?ds=inline;hp=d1e714e485a8d0e498ccf7b358dbb7445d18373b comment on autoindex branch --- diff --git a/doc/bugs/transient_autocreated_tagbase_is_not_transient_autoindexed.mdwn b/doc/bugs/transient_autocreated_tagbase_is_not_transient_autoindexed.mdwn index b0d88ec6d..225a60141 100644 --- a/doc/bugs/transient_autocreated_tagbase_is_not_transient_autoindexed.mdwn +++ b/doc/bugs/transient_autocreated_tagbase_is_not_transient_autoindexed.mdwn @@ -31,3 +31,13 @@ Shouldn't `ikiwiki-tag-test/raw/.ikiwiki/transient/tag.mdwn` and `ikiwiki-tag-te > git repositories any more? My `autoindex-more` branch changes > the logic so it will do what you want in the `autoindex_commit => 0` > case, and amends the appropriate regression test. --[[smcv]] + +>> the autoindex-more-often branch looks good to me in general. +>> +>> i do have doubts about the 3ba2ef1a patch ("remove unnecessary special case +>> for transient underlay"): now that we consider the complete transient +>> directory as well, the sequence in which the refresh hooks are called starts +>> to matter, and pages created by other plugins in a similar fashion as by +>> autoindex will only be included the next time refresh gets called. +>> +>> --[[chrysn]]