From: https://id.koumbit.net/anarcat <https://id.koumbit.net/anarcat@web>
Date: Fri, 30 Nov 2012 04:40:43 +0000 (-0400)
Subject: why not try lucene too?
X-Git-Tag: 3.20121212~12
X-Git-Url: http://git.vanrenterghem.biz/git.ikiwiki.info.git/commitdiff_plain/29f111c47c2bcae941bb3d604a95c64b7c374255?ds=sidebyside

why not try lucene too?
---

diff --git a/doc/todo/lucene_search_engine.mdwn b/doc/todo/lucene_search_engine.mdwn
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..694c81c4c
--- /dev/null
+++ b/doc/todo/lucene_search_engine.mdwn
@@ -0,0 +1 @@
+There are [some issue](http://www.branchable.com/bugs/Exception:_Cannot_open_tables_at_consistent_revisions_at___47__usr__47__lib__47__perl5__47__Search__47__Xapian__47__WritableDatabase.pm_line_41./#comment-c159ea3f9be35fcd9ed0eeedb162e816) with the current search engine. Sometimes the database gets corrupted and it's not very good at weighting say, the title against the content. In [[different_search_engine]], there was the idea of using Lucene - is there any reason why we should have both, or at least let lucene live in contrib?