From: https://id.koumbit.net/anarcat Date: Mon, 5 Mar 2012 02:04:15 +0000 (-0400) Subject: update progress: migration script in place, this is mostly finished, minus some caveats X-Git-Tag: 3.20120203~75 X-Git-Url: http://git.vanrenterghem.biz/git.ikiwiki.info.git/commitdiff_plain/0b15ae0761e68ba5635f90c29b77c3cdbeb43a8f?hp=318687f84d152d3a52683f09dff17deb08ab6eeb update progress: migration script in place, this is mostly finished, minus some caveats --- diff --git a/doc/todo/do_not_make_links_backwards.mdwn b/doc/todo/do_not_make_links_backwards.mdwn index a2d1abc49..a8001c400 100644 --- a/doc/todo/do_not_make_links_backwards.mdwn +++ b/doc/todo/do_not_make_links_backwards.mdwn @@ -15,7 +15,7 @@ The following needs to be done: 1. the `link_regexp` variable needs to be turned backwards (or frontwards, if you like :P) (./) added an option for this, working! 2. a config setting need to be added to the `link` plugin so that we can choose if we want backwards links or not (./) `links_direction`, how does that sound? I have changed that from `backwards_links` to be more neutral. 'rtl' means `\[[link|text]]` and 'ltr' means `\[[text|link]]` - 3. a (solid!) parser needs to be written for [[ikiwiki-transition]] to change the actual links (if necessary) (!) in progress, almost done - 4. rewrite tests to take into account the two syntaxes + 3. a (solid!) parser needs to be written for [[ikiwiki-transition]] to change the actual links (if necessary) (./) done! + 4. rewrite tests to take into account the two syntaxes (!) I would need help here, always have trouble with unit tests... -There's a blocker: we can't have a per-wiki backwards_links option, because of the underlay, common to all wikis, which needs to be converted. So the option doesn't make much sense. Not sure how to deal with this... Maybe this needs to be at the package level? + There's a caveat: we can't have a per-wiki backwards_links option, because of the underlay, common to all wikis, which needs to be converted. So the option doesn't make much sense. Not sure how to deal with this... Maybe this needs to be at the package level?