X-Git-Url: http://git.vanrenterghem.biz/git.ikiwiki.info.git/blobdiff_plain/fb26b9ca849b2cc8090e317c0cba790da76c425a..c1a42e76bc6667bfb2882a12d53c25d9f952ca82:/doc/bugs/img_vs_align.mdwn diff --git a/doc/bugs/img_vs_align.mdwn b/doc/bugs/img_vs_align.mdwn index dcb9129b9..6eff46178 100644 --- a/doc/bugs/img_vs_align.mdwn +++ b/doc/bugs/img_vs_align.mdwn @@ -9,3 +9,23 @@ almost of my CSS foo again ;-) it seems.) --[[tschwinge]] > > I've edited the URL you provided to demonstrate this -- hope you don't mind! I've also added an inline, right-aligned image to this page.[[!tag done]] > -- [[Jon]] + +> Contrary to all of the above, html does not care about P tags when +> floating an image to the left or right via align. Proof: +> , where the image +> is in its own paragraph but still floats. Also, I re-modified a local +> copy of the hurd page to enclose the image in a P, and it still floats. +> +> Tested with Chromium and Firefox. --[[Joey]] + +>> Uh, sorry for not confirming what I supposed to be with looking into +>> the relevant standard. It just seemed too obvious to me that the +>> closure of `

...

` would confine whatever embedded stuff may be +>> doing. (Meaning, I didn't expect that the *img*'s alignment would +>> propagate to the *p*'s and would thus be visible from the outside.) +>> +>> I confirm (Firefox, Ubuntu jaunty) that your picture page is being +>> shown correctly -- thus I suppose that there's a buglet in our CSS +>> scripts again... +>> +>> --[[tschwinge]]