X-Git-Url: http://git.vanrenterghem.biz/git.ikiwiki.info.git/blobdiff_plain/f1a70921e3bfc0496b5564582a5a1463b7a98c09..41902cb9060787e798144fbaf12886e8d13fff25:/doc/ikiwiki/directive/inline/discussion.mdwn?ds=inline diff --git a/doc/ikiwiki/directive/inline/discussion.mdwn b/doc/ikiwiki/directive/inline/discussion.mdwn index be0665d04..5489d5f16 100644 --- a/doc/ikiwiki/directive/inline/discussion.mdwn +++ b/doc/ikiwiki/directive/inline/discussion.mdwn @@ -1,3 +1,10 @@ +## Combine inline and toggle + +Is it possible to combine the behaviour of toggle and inline? ie, have it present of list of 'headlines' which are created from seperate subpages which can be clicked to expand to the body of the inlined page. Thanks. + +-- Thiana + +--- ## How do you provide the per post discussion links in your own blog? > That's configured by the "actions" parameter to the inline directive. See @@ -124,3 +131,33 @@ My index page has: Else can you please suggest a smarter way of getting certain data out from pages for a inline index? --[[hendry]] + +## A different idea: smuggling hook routines in through %params. + +The part that fetches the inlined content is quite compact. It's just the if ($needcontent) {} chunk. Would a patch that accepts a perl sub smuggled through something like $params{inliner_} be accepted? If that param exists, call it instead of the current content of that chunk. Pass $page, %params, and $template. Receive $content, possibly seeing $template modified. The custom directives can add inliner_ to %params and call IkiWiki::preprocess_inline. I suppose IkiWiki::Plugin::inline could be modified to strip any *_ out of the directive's arguments to prevent any custom behavior from leaking into the inline directive. + +I'm about to try this for a CV/resume type of thing. I want only one element with a specific id out of the generated content (with a little post-processing). I don't need performance for my case. + +Update: Pretty much works. I need a way to skip sources, but inline shrinks the list of all pages *before* trying to form them. Next little bit... + +--[[JasonRiedy]] + +--- + +## Interaction of `show` and `feedshow` + +Reading the documentation I would think that `feedshow` does not +influence `show`. + + \[[!inline pages="./blog/*" archive=yes quick=yes feedshow=10 sort=title reverse=yes]] + +Only ten pages are listed in this example although `archive` is set to +yes. Removing `feedshow=10` all matching pages are shown. + +Is that behaviour intended? + +> Is something going wrong because `quick="yes"` [[»turns off generation of any feeds«|inline]]? --[[PaulePanter]] + +--[[PaulePanter]] + +>> Bug was that if feedshow was specified without show it limited to it incorrectly. Fixed. --[[Joey]]