X-Git-Url: http://git.vanrenterghem.biz/git.ikiwiki.info.git/blobdiff_plain/f012c9d795e1c1688d29e23074d71c3eba1824d1..bcb4bcc0173a048138920792627ed290c84e5bfe:/doc/todo/mercurial.mdwn diff --git a/doc/todo/mercurial.mdwn b/doc/todo/mercurial.mdwn index 0a20dd5b0..de1f148e5 100644 --- a/doc/todo/mercurial.mdwn +++ b/doc/todo/mercurial.mdwn @@ -1,5 +1,129 @@ -* Need to get post commit hook working (or an example of how to use it.) -* rcs_notify is not implemented * Is the code sufficiently robust? It just warns when mercurial fails. * When rcs_commit is called with a $user that is an openid, it will be passed through to mercurial -u. Will mercurial choke on this? + * Nope. Mercurial doesn't expect any particular format for the username, + though "Name " is standard. --[[bma]] +* The way `-u $user` is passed to `hg commit`, there's no way to tell + if a given commit came in over the web or was done directly. So + rcs_recentchanges hardcodes 'committype => "mercurial"'. See the monotone + backend for an example of one that does this right. +* The rcs_commit implementation seems not to notice if the file has been + changed since a web edit started. Unlike all the other frontends, which + use the rcstoken to detect if the web commit started editing an earlier + version of the file, and if so, merge the two sets of changes together. + It seems that with the current mercurial commit code, it will always + blindly overwrite the current file with the web edited version, losing + any other changes. +* `rcs_commit_staged`, `rcs_rename`, `rcs_remove`, and `rcs_diff` are not + implemented for mercurial, and so attachments, remove and rename plugins + and recentchangesdiff cannot be used with it. (These should be fairly + easy to add..) + +Posthook: in `$srcdir/.hg/hgrc`, I have the following + + [hooks] + incoming.update = hg up + update.ikiwiki = ikiwiki --setup /path/to/ikiwiki.setup --refresh + +This should update the working directory and run ikiwiki every time a change is recorded (someone who knows mercurial better than I do may be able to suggest a better way, but this works for me.) + +> Try running it with --post-commit instead of --refresh. That should +> work better, handling both the case where the edit was made via the web +> and then committed, and the case where a commit was made directly. +> It can deadlock if the post-commit hook runs with --refresh in the +> former case. --[[Joey]] + +The problem with --post-commit is that if you delete some pages in $SRC, ikiwiki --setup setupfile --post-commit will not delete them in $DEST. --[[users/weakish]] + +> You should really be using a setup file that has `mercurial_wrapper` +> set, and running the wrapper generated by that from your hook. +> That will work. I think that the `--setup --post-commit` on the command +> line is currently broken and does the same expensive rebuild process as --setup +> alone (which doesn't delete files from $DEST either). Will fix that. +> (fixed) +> --[[Joey]] + +>> Mercurial doesn't support put hooks in .hg/hooks/* (like git). In Mercurial, the only way to run +>> your own hooks is specifying them in the hgrc file. (Or write a new extension.) +>> I guess use a very long command will work. +>> (e.g. ikiwiki --post-commit --a-lot-of-switches --set var=value $SRC $DEST) +>> (Fortunately ikiwiki supports --set var=value so without --setup works.) +>> +>> Alternative is always editing via cgi or pushing. Never work on the $SRC/repo directly. +>> --[[users/weakish]] + +>>> I don't see anything preventing you from using a setup file with +>>> `mercurial_wrapper => ".hg/ikiwiki-hook",` and then modifying the hgrc +>>> to run that wrapper. --[[Joey]] + +>> Thanks for pointing out this. I have some stupid misunderstanding on the +>> usage of mercurial_wrapper before. The wrapper works nicely! --[[weakish]] + +I add the following to .hg/hgrc:(I use changegroup since I don't think we need refresh per changeset, please point out if I am wrong.) + + [hooks] + changegroup = hg update >&2 && ikiwiki --setup path.to.setup.file --refresh + post-commit = path.to.the.mercurial.wrapper + +----- + +I have no idea when the deadlock will happen. --[[users/weakish]] + +> For the deadlock to occur, a edit has to be made via the web. +> +> Ikiwiki, +> running as a CGI, takes a lock on the wiki, and commits the edit, +> continuing to run in the background, with the lock still held. +> When the edit is committed, the hg hook runs, running `ikwiki --refresh`. +> Nearly the first thing that process does it try to lock the wiki.. +> which is already locked. This lock is taken in a blocking manner, +> thus the deadlock -- the cgi is waiting for the commit to finish before +> dropping the lock, and the commit is blocked waiting for the lock to be +> released. +> +> --post-commit avoids this problem by checking if the cgi is running +> and avoiding doing anything in that case. (While still handing the +> refresh if the commit was not made by the CGI.) +> So in that case, the commit finishes w/o ikiwiki doing anything, +> and the ikiwiki CGI handles the wiki refresh. +> --[[Joey]] + + +*** + +I have a few notes on mercurial usage after trying it out for a while: + +1. I have been using ikiwiki's `--post-commit` option without apparent problems. I'm the only current user of my wiki, though. + +1. The `ikiwiki.setup` file included in ikiwiki works with mercurial's `hgserve`, which is not the preferred solution. Mercurial's `hgwebdir.cgi` is more flexible and doesn't require running a server. I have this in my .setup file: + + # Mercurial stuff. + rcs => "mercurial", + historyurl => "http://localhost/cgi-bin/hgwebdir.cgi/ikiwiki/log/tip/\[[file]]", + diffurl => "http://localhost/cgi-bin/hgwebdir.cgi/ikiwiki/diff/tip/\[[file]]", + +1. I have noticed that running `ikiwiki` after a change to the wiki adds files to a directory called `recentchanges` under `$srcdir`. I don't understand why such files are needed; worse, they are not added to mercurial's list of tracked files, so they polute the output of `hg log`. Is this a bug? Should mercurial's commit hook be modified to add these files before the commit? + +--buo + +> No, those files should not be added to revision control. --[[Joey]] + +>> OK. I see two problems: + +>> 1. If I clone my wiki, I won't get an exact copy of it: I will lose the recentchanges history. This could be an acceptable limitation but IMO this should be documented. + +>>> The history is stored in mercurial. How will it be lost? + +>> 2. The output of `hg status` is polluted. This could be solved trivially by adding a line containing `recentchanges` to `.hgignore`. Another alternative would be to store the `recentchanges` directory inside `$srdcir/.ikiwiki`. + +>> I think the ideal solution would be to build `$destdir/recentchanges/*` directly from the output of `hg log`. --[[buo]] + +>>>> That would be 100 times as slow, so I chose not to do that. --[[Joey]] + +>>>> Since this is confusing people, allow me to clarify: Ikiwiki's +>>>> recentchanges generation pulls log information directly out of the VCS as +>>>> needed. It caches it in recentchanges/* in the `scrdir`. These cache +>>>> files need not be preserved, should never be checked into VCS, and if +>>>> you want to you can configure your VCSignore file to ignore them, +>>>> just as you can configure it to ignore the `.ikiwiki` directory in the +>>>> `scrdir`. --[[Joey]]