X-Git-Url: http://git.vanrenterghem.biz/git.ikiwiki.info.git/blobdiff_plain/ef4b9b54206bec2930d387b57ebbb5d7b2a5dce2..92ba3bb4a1b84ffa791fa0be88529e96fd71b157:/doc/todo/clear_page_to_delete.mdwn?ds=sidebyside

diff --git a/doc/todo/clear_page_to_delete.mdwn b/doc/todo/clear_page_to_delete.mdwn
index 1a0d3f008..50ae246bb 100644
--- a/doc/todo/clear_page_to_delete.mdwn
+++ b/doc/todo/clear_page_to_delete.mdwn
@@ -14,3 +14,20 @@ question is really:
 
 Re vandalism in general, I am generally happy using git-revert to kill the
 offending change. --[[Joey]]
+
+I don't think we need a second way to delete pages, which would probably be
+used by the only few people who will learn it's possible by random
+documentation reading, find it useful, *and* remember it. -- [[intrigeri]]
+
+On the other hand, clearing the page's whole content essentially means deleting
+the page.  That's what the user intended to do in this case.  The information
+content of an empty vs. a deleted page is essentially the same, I'd say.  But
+having ikiwiki remove those stale pages would save some (minimal, admittedly)
+time needed for manual clean-up.  --[[tschwinge]]
+
+On EmacsWiki, a page is marked for deletion when it contains just the DeletedPage 
+keyword and if there were no page editions since XX days. Here, I use pages that
+can be empty everyday and filled all day long. It does not make sense to me to 
+delete these pages :). --[[xma]]
+
+I was not aware of [[plugins/remove]]. I don't think another method is necessary -- [[JonDowland]]