X-Git-Url: http://git.vanrenterghem.biz/git.ikiwiki.info.git/blobdiff_plain/e81e06641641f60629f24da93f1e2d64b3288f2a..f77784affdc9f05be06eb0be3c26bb81ef41ec8f:/doc/todo/rewrite_ikiwiki_in_haskell/discussion.mdwn diff --git a/doc/todo/rewrite_ikiwiki_in_haskell/discussion.mdwn b/doc/todo/rewrite_ikiwiki_in_haskell/discussion.mdwn index a12a5fe27..01910a97c 100644 --- a/doc/todo/rewrite_ikiwiki_in_haskell/discussion.mdwn +++ b/doc/todo/rewrite_ikiwiki_in_haskell/discussion.mdwn @@ -4,3 +4,52 @@ Congratulations for demonstrating that April fools jokes can still be subtle > Having said all that, have you looked at erlang? Have you heard of couchdb? > I'd strongly recommend looking at that. -- [[Jon]] + +>> I've glanced at couchdb, but don't see how it would tie in with ikiwiki. +>> --[[Joey]] + + +>>> It doesn't really. I recently (re-)read about couchdb and thought that +>>> what it was trying to do had some comparisons with the thinking going on +>>> in [[todo/structured_page_data]]. -- [[Jon]] + +----- + +I'm torn about this idea, if it's actually serious. I'm very comfortable +programming in Perl, and have written quite a few modules for IkiWiki, and +it would be a huge pain to have to start from scratch all over again. On +the other hand, this could be a motivation for me to learn Haskell. My +only encounter with Haskell has been a brief time when I was using the +Xmonad window manager, but it looks like an interesting language. +Functional programming is cool. + +There are a lot of interesting plusses for Haskell you note (in the parent +page), but it's true that the idea is horribly daunting (as [[Joey]] said +"If only I had a spare year"). Is there any way that you could "start +small"? Because nothing will ever happen if the task is too daunting to +even start. + +> This seems destined to remain a thought experiment unless something like +> that can be done, or I get a serious case of second system disease. +> +> I've considered doing things like using the external plugin interface +> to run a separate haskell program, which would allow implementing +> arbitrary plugins in haskell (starting with a pandoc plugin..), +> and could perhaps grow to subsume the perl code. However, this would +> stick us with the perl data structures, which are not a very good fit +> for haskell. --[[Joey]] + +On further thought... perhaps it would be easier to fork or contribute to +an existing Haskell-based wiki, such as Hakyll? + +--[[KathrynAndersen]] + +> As far as I know there are no other wikis (haskell or otherwise) +> that are wiki compilers. Since we know from experience that dealing +> with static compilation turns out to be one of the trickiest parts of +> ikiwiki, I'm doubtful about trying to bolt that into one. --[[Joey]] + +>> Haykll isn't a wiki but it does do static compilation. The missing +>> parts are: the web interface, the wiki link processing, and page +>> dependency stuff. -- [[tychoish]]