X-Git-Url: http://git.vanrenterghem.biz/git.ikiwiki.info.git/blobdiff_plain/e7d54e3f9156fb856d39131ad8e41f619a536204..e40c8a6a039fcfb60fc4ff8bc03838c1f1d96efa:/doc/todo/headless_git_branches.mdwn?ds=inline diff --git a/doc/todo/headless_git_branches.mdwn b/doc/todo/headless_git_branches.mdwn index e97b59900..bedf21d0c 100644 --- a/doc/todo/headless_git_branches.mdwn +++ b/doc/todo/headless_git_branches.mdwn @@ -6,49 +6,100 @@ Ikiwiki should really survive being asked to work with a git branch that has no git clone barerepo.git srcdir ikiwiki --rcs=git srcdir destdir -I've fixed this initial construction case, and, based on my testing, I've also fixed the post-update executing on a new master, and ikiwiki.cgi executing on a non-existent master cases. Unfortunately these cases still generate a lot of warnings from recentchanges; I suspect a much more invasive patch would be needed to shut those up. +I've fixed this initial construction case, and, based on my testing, I've +also fixed the post-update executing on a new master, and ikiwiki.cgi +executing on a non-existent master cases. Please commit so my users stop whining at me about having clean branches to push to, the big babies. -Summary: Change three scary loud failure cases related to empty branches into three scary loud success cases. +Summary: Change three scary loud failure cases related to empty branches into three mostly quiet success cases. [[!tag patch]] +> FWIW, [[The_TOVA_Company]] apparently wants this feature (and I hope +> I don't mind that I mention they were willing to pay someone for it, +> but I told them I'd not done any of the work. :) ) +> +> Code review follows, per hunk.. --[[Joey]] +
diff --git a/IkiWiki/Plugin/git.pm b/IkiWiki/Plugin/git.pm -index cf7fbe9..5b1e334 100644 +index cf7fbe9..e5bafcf 100644 --- a/IkiWiki/Plugin/git.pm +++ b/IkiWiki/Plugin/git.pm -@@ -439,10 +439,13 @@ sub git_commit_info ($;$) { +@@ -439,17 +439,21 @@ sub git_commit_info ($;$) { my @opts; push @opts, "--max-count=$num" if defined $num; -+ my @raw_lines; - +- - my @raw_lines = run_or_die('git', 'log', @opts, - '--pretty=raw', '--raw', '--abbrev=40', '--always', '-c', - '-r', $sha1, '--', '.'); -+ if (-e $config{srcdir} . "/.git/refs/heads/" . $config{gitmaster_branch}) { -+ @raw_lines = run_or_die('git', 'log', @opts, -+ '--pretty=raw', '--raw', '--abbrev=40', '--always', '-c', -+ '-r', $sha1, '--', '.'); -+ }; - +- ++ my @raw_lines; my @ci; - while (my $parsed = parse_diff_tree(\@raw_lines)) { -@@ -474,7 +477,10 @@ sub rcs_update () { +- while (my $parsed = parse_diff_tree(\@raw_lines)) { +- push @ci, $parsed; +- } ++ ++ # Test to see if branch actually exists yet. ++ if (run_or_non('git', 'show-ref', '--quiet', '--verify', '--', 'refs/heads/' . $config{gitmaster_branch}) ) { ++ @raw_lines = run_or_die('git', 'log', @opts, ++ '--pretty=raw', '--raw', '--abbrev=40', '--always', '-c', ++ '-r', $sha1, '--', '.'); ++ ++ while (my $parsed = parse_diff_tree(\@raw_lines)) { ++ push @ci, $parsed; ++ } + +- warn "Cannot parse commit info for '$sha1' commit" if !@ci; ++ warn "Cannot parse commit info for '$sha1' commit" if !@ci; ++ }; + + return wantarray ? @ci : $ci[0]; + } ++ +My concern is that this adds a bit of slowdown (git show-ref is fast, but +It's still extra work) to a very hot code path that is run to eg, +update recentchanges after every change. + +Seems not ideal to do extra work every time to handle a case +that will literally happen a maximum of once in the entire lifecycle of a +wiki (and zero times more typically, since the setup automator puts in a +.gitignore file that works around this problem). + +So as to not just say "no" ... what if it always tried to run git log, +and if it failed (or returned no parsed lines), then it could look +at git show-ref to deduce whether to throw an error or not. +--[[Joey]] + +> Ah, but then git-log would still complain "bad revision 'HEAD'" +> --[[Joey]] + +
+@@ -474,7 +478,10 @@ sub rcs_update () { # Update working directory. if (length $config{gitorigin_branch}) { - run_or_cry('git', 'pull', '--prune', $config{gitorigin_branch}); -+ run_or_cry('git', 'fetch', '--prune', $config{gitorigin_branch}); -+ if (-e $config{srcdir} . '/.git/refs/remotes/' . $config{gitorigin_branch} . '/' . $config{gitmaster_branch}) { -+ run_or_cry('git', 'merge', $config{gitorigin_branch} . '/' . $config{gitmaster_branch}); -+ } ++ run_or_cry('git', 'fetch', '--prune', $config{gitorigin_branch}); ++ if (run_or_non('git', 'show-ref', '--quiet', '--verify', '--', 'refs/remotes/' . $config{gitorigin_branch} . '/' . $config{gitmaster_branch}) ) { ++ run_or_cry('git', 'merge', $config{gitorigin_branch} . '/' . $config{gitmaster_branch}); ++ } } } - -@@ -559,7 +565,7 @@ sub rcs_commit_helper (@) { + ++ +Same concern here about extra work. Code path is nearly as hot, being +called on every refresh. Probably could be dealt with similarly as above. + +Also, is there any point in breaking the pull up into a +fetch followed by a merge? --[[Joey]] + +
+@@ -559,7 +566,7 @@ sub rcs_commit_helper (@) { # So we should ignore its exit status (hence run_or_non). if (run_or_non('git', 'commit', '-m', $params{message}, '-q', @opts)) { if (length $config{gitorigin_branch}) { @@ -56,4 +107,7 @@ index cf7fbe9..5b1e334 100644 + run_or_cry('git', 'push', $config{gitorigin_branch}, $config{gitmaster_branch}); } } ++ +This seems fine to apply. --[[Joey]]