X-Git-Url: http://git.vanrenterghem.biz/git.ikiwiki.info.git/blobdiff_plain/e4e53d7a18ec18d1ba72b1a4f124e211148e0f12..c22f316ae153af4dba1a8a09ee743807d636bace:/doc/todo/matching_different_kinds_of_links.mdwn?ds=inline

diff --git a/doc/todo/matching_different_kinds_of_links.mdwn b/doc/todo/matching_different_kinds_of_links.mdwn
index 2cd484852..da3ea49f6 100644
--- a/doc/todo/matching_different_kinds_of_links.mdwn
+++ b/doc/todo/matching_different_kinds_of_links.mdwn
@@ -53,7 +53,7 @@ I don't have any opinion on this syntax (whether it's good or not)...--Ivan Z.
 
 -------
 
->> [[!template id=gitbranch author="[[Simon_McVittie|smcv]]" branch=smcv/link-types]]
+>> [[!template id=gitbranch author="[[Simon_McVittie|smcv]]" branch=smcv/ready/link-types]]
 >> [[!tag patch]]
 
 ## Documentation for smcv's branch
@@ -106,6 +106,10 @@ Some code refers to `oldtypedlinks`, and other to `oldlinktypes`. --[[Joey]]
 
 >> A test suite for the dependency resolver *would* be nice. --[[Joey]]
 
+>>> Bug fixed, I think. A test suite for the dependency resolver seems
+>>> more ambitious than I want to get into right now, but I added a
+>>> unit test for this part of it... --s
+
 I'm curious what your reasoning was for adding a new variable
 rather than using `pagestate`. Was it only because you needed
 the `old` version to detect change, or was there other complexity?
@@ -120,6 +124,17 @@ the `old` version to detect change, or was there other complexity?
 > my docs for `%typedlinks`, so I'll try to write docs for it as
 > `pagestate` and see if they work any better. --s
 
+>> On reflection, I don't think it's any better as a pagestate, and
+>> the contents of pagestates (so far) aren't documented for other
+>> plugins' consumption, so I'm inclined to leave it as-is, unless
+>> you want to veto that. Loose rationale: it needs special handling
+>> in the core to be a dependency type (I re-used the existing link
+>> type), it's API beyond a single plugin, and it's really part of
+>> the core parallel to pagestate rather than being tied to a
+>> specific plugin. Also, I'd need to special-case it to have
+>> ikiwiki not delete it from the index, unless I introduced a
+>> dummy typedlinks plugin (or just hook) that did nothing... --s
+
 I have not convinced myself this is a real problem, but..
 If a page has a typed link, there seems to be no way to tell
 if it also has a separate, regular link. `add_link` will add
@@ -145,6 +160,8 @@ without too much transitional trouble. --[[Joey]]
 > on the current semantics, on one of the pages requesting this
 > change. --s
 
+>> Removed in a newer version of the branch. --s
+
 I might have been wrong to introduce `typedlink(tag foo)`. It's not
 very user-friendly, and is more useful as a backend for other plugins
 that as a feature in its own right - any plugin introducing a link
@@ -156,3 +173,24 @@ though... --[[smcv]]
 
 > I agree, per-type matchers are more friendly and I'm not enamored of the
 > multi-parameter pagespec syntax. --[[Joey]]
+
+>> Removed in a newer version of the branch. I re-introduced it as a
+>> plugin in `smcv/typedlink`, but I don't think we really need it. --s
+
+----
+
+I am ready to merge this, but I noticed one problem -- since `match_tagged`
+now only matches pages with the tag linktype, a wiki will need to be
+rebuilt on upgrade in order to get the linktype of existing tags in it
+recorded. So there needs to be a NEWS item about this and
+the postinst modified to force the rebuild.
+
+> Done, although you'll need to plug in an appropriate version number when
+> you release it. Is there a distinctive reminder string you grep for
+> during releases? I've used `UNRELEASED` for now. --[[smcv]]
+
+Also, the ready branch adds `typedlink()` to [[ikiwiki/pagespec]],
+but you removed that feature as documented above.
+--[[Joey]]
+
+> [[Done]]. --s