X-Git-Url: http://git.vanrenterghem.biz/git.ikiwiki.info.git/blobdiff_plain/d5e65e582a34ae2494fee493ddcb2b959e4a4bce..ca9e45c3ba2ad852123aeb8783eed07ed73ce00c:/doc/todo/darcs.mdwn diff --git a/doc/todo/darcs.mdwn b/doc/todo/darcs.mdwn index e757867d2..882a41379 100644 --- a/doc/todo/darcs.mdwn +++ b/doc/todo/darcs.mdwn @@ -219,14 +219,14 @@ This is my ([bma](bma@bmalee.eu)) darcs.pm - it's messy (my Perl isn't up to muc package IkiWiki; - sub rcs_update () { #{{{ + sub rcs_update () { # Do nothing - there's nowhere to update *from*. - } #}}} + } - sub rcs_prepedit ($) { #{{{ - } #}}} + sub rcs_prepedit ($) { + } - sub rcs_commit ($$$;$$) { #{{{ + sub rcs_commit ($$$;$$) { my ($file, $message, $rcstoken, $user, $ipaddr) = @_; # $user should probably be a name and an email address, by darcs @@ -257,16 +257,16 @@ This is my ([bma](bma@bmalee.eu)) darcs.pm - it's messy (my Perl isn't up to muc return undef; # success - sub rcs_add ($) { # {{{ + sub rcs_add ($) { my ($file) = @_; my @cmdline = ("darcs", "add", "--repodir", "$config{srcdir}", "-a", "-q", "$file"); if (system(@cmdline) != 0) { warn "'@cmdline' failed: $!"; } - } #}}} + } - sub rcs_recentchanges ($) { #{{{ + sub rcs_recentchanges ($) { # TODO: This is horrible code. It doesn't work perfectly, and uses regexes # rather than parsing Darcs' XML output. my $num=shift; @@ -314,15 +314,15 @@ This is my ([bma](bma@bmalee.eu)) darcs.pm - it's messy (my Perl isn't up to muc } } return @ret; - } #}}} + } - sub rcs_notify () { #{{{ + sub rcs_notify () { # TODO - } #}}} + } - sub rcs_getctime ($) { #{{{ + sub rcs_getctime ($) { error gettext("getctime not implemented"); - } #}}} + } 1 @@ -484,4 +484,68 @@ I have addressed the recentchanges bit, you can find my hacked up darcs.pm at (now a darcs repo) + +> Note that there's a 'darcs' branch in git that I'm keeping a copy of your +> code in. Just in case. :-) + +I've taken all the good stuff from the above and added the missing hooks. The code hasn't seen a lot of testing, so some bugs are likely yet to surface. Also, I'm not experienced with perl and don't know where I should have used the function `possibly_foolish_untaint`. + +Regarding the repository layout: There are two darcs repositories. One is the `srcdir`, the other we'll call `master`. + + * HTML is generated from `srcdir`. + * CGI edits happen in `srcdir`. + * The backend pulls updates from `master` into `srcdir`, i.e. darcs commits should happen to `master`. + * `master` calls ikiwiki (through a wrapper) in its apply posthook, i.e. `master/_darcs/prefs/defaults` should look like this: + + apply posthook ikiwrap + apply run-posthook + + (I'm not sure, should/could it be `ikiwrap --refresh` above?) + * The backend pushes CGI edits from `srcdir` back into `master` (triggering the apply hook). + * The working copies in `srcdir` and `master` should *not* be touched by the user, only by the CGI or darcs, respectively. + +> Review of this one: +> +> * Should use tab indentation. +> * `rcs_getctime` should not need to use a ctime cache (such a cache should +> also not be named `.ikiwiki.ctimes`). `rcs_getctime` is run exactly +> once per page, ever, and the data is cached in ikiwiki's index. +> * I doubt that ENV{DARCS} will be available, since the wrapper clobbers> the entire +> environment. I'd say remove that. +> * I don't understand what `darcs_info` is doing, but it seems to be +> parsing xml with a regexp? +> * Looks like `rcs_commit` needs a few improvements, as marked TODO +> * `rcs_remove` just calls "rm"? Does darcs record notice the file was removed +> and automatically commit the removal? (And why `system("rm")` and not +> `unlink`?) +> * Is the the darcs info in [[details]] still up-to-date re this version? +> --[[Joey]] + +> Update: +> +> I think I've addressed all of the above except for the XML parsing in `darcs_info`. +> The function determines the md5 hash of the last patch the given file appears in. +> That's indeed being done with regexps but my Perl isn't good enough for a quick recode +> right now. +> +> As for the darcs info in [[rcs/details]], it does not accurately describe the way +> this version works. It's similar, but the details differ slightly. +> You could copy my description above to replace it. +> +> There is still some ironing to do, for instance the current version doesn't allow for +> modifying attachments by re-uploading them via CGI ("darcs add failed"). Am I assuming +> correctly that "adding" a file that's already in the repo should just be a no-op? +> --pesco + +>> It should result in the new file contents being committed by +>> `rcs_commit_staged`. For some revision control systems, which +>> automatically commit modifications, it would be a no-op. --[[Joey]] + +>>> Done. --pesco + [[!tag patch]]