X-Git-Url: http://git.vanrenterghem.biz/git.ikiwiki.info.git/blobdiff_plain/d05d052bff599327cf43b6f00e337197f1d2ab18..37b5b0541f0446d792aa8607f273cea41ea04303:/doc/index/discussion.mdwn?ds=sidebyside

diff --git a/doc/index/discussion.mdwn b/doc/index/discussion.mdwn
index 3c51ad99e..6b233882e 100644
--- a/doc/index/discussion.mdwn
+++ b/doc/index/discussion.mdwn
@@ -199,6 +199,11 @@ actions.  However, it may not be something everyone appreciates.  Any thoughts?
 > Maybe, although it would need to take the critisism at
 > http://www.cs.tut.fi/~jkorpela/forms/accesskey.html into account.
 
+>> Thank you for that link. Given that the edit link is the first thing you tab to
+>> in the current layout, I guess it isn't all that necessary. I have had a 
+>> a user complaint recently that Alt-e in oddmuse was overriding his access
+>> to the browser menu.
+
 ----
 
 # Editing the style sheet.
@@ -206,6 +211,20 @@ actions.  However, it may not be something everyone appreciates.  Any thoughts?
 It would be nice to be able to edit the stylesheet by means of the cgi.  Or is this possible?  I wasn't able to achieve it.
 Ok, that's my last 2 cents for a while. --[Mazirian](http://mazirian.com)
 
+> I don't support editing it, but if/when ikiwiki gets file upload support,
+> it'll be possible to upload a style sheet. (If .css is in the allowed
+> extensions list.. no idea how safe that would be, a style sheet is
+> probably a great place to put XSS attacks and evil javascript that would
+> be filtered out of any regular page in ikiwiki). --[[Joey]]
+
+>> I hadn't thought of that at all.  It's a common feature and one I've
+>> relied on safely, because the wikis I am maintaining at the moment
+>> are all private and restricted to trusted users. Given that the whole
+>> point of ikiwiki is to be able to access and edit via the shell as
+>> well as the web, I suppose the features doesn't add a lot.  By the
+>> way, the w3m mode is brilliant.  I haven't tried it yet, but the idea
+>> is great.
+
 ----
 
 # Disable build/install requirement on PerlMagick
@@ -213,3 +232,45 @@ Ok, that's my last 2 cents for a while. --[Mazirian](http://mazirian.com)
 Some installs of PerlMagick require X11. I tried to first disable using "img" by using "--disable-plugin img"
 in the Makefile. But still failed. My workaround was to remove "img" from the bundle in IkiWiki/Plugin/goodstuff.pm
 before building. What is the recommended way to install ikiwiki without "img" support? --[[JeremyReed]]
+
+> I've fixed this in svn so plugins in goodstuff can be disabled. --[[Joey]]
+
+----
+
+# Documentation for banning users?
+
+The [[todo]] page says admins can ban users. Where is this documented? I search the source and found 
+set\_banned\_users() which led me to the CGI "preferences" form for the admin. Now logged in as an admin (as defined in my setup configuration),
+I see the field for this. But no details on how to use it. From the source it appears to be a space-delimited list of usernames. (I didn't test yet.)
+
+Can you please provide a [[/banned_users]] documentation about "banning" users function linked from the [[Features]] page and maybe [[security]] page and linked from the "preferences" for the admin?
+(I don't do this myself as I am unsure about this and still reading the code about banning users.)
+
+----
+
+# Documentation for locking pages?
+
+The [[features]] page, the [[todo]] page and the [[usage]] manual page say pages can be locked and only the admin can edit locked pages.
+Where is locking pages documented? ... A moment later, from searching source I found this is configured via the preferences for the admin
+and that links to [[pagespec]].
+
+Can you please provide a [[/page_locking]] doc about locking pages linked from the [[features]] page and elsewhere? And have that link to [[pagespec]]?
+(I don't do this myself as I am unsure about this and still reading the code about locking pages.)
+
+----
+
+# RecentChanges should show path to wiki sub-pages?
+
+The RecentChanges only shows the final file name for the recently changes file,
+for example "discussion". It would be more useful to see "index/discussion"
+or the path to the sub-page. I think this is handled by the htmllink() routine.
+
+>> IMHO it's a good idea and I like it. Often I can see changes in
+>> any discussion page, but I don't know without clicking the link
+>> what discussion was changed.
+
+>> However, I can see one problem here. You can commit via command line
+>> changes in many pages. It will be displayed ugly then, because probably
+>> a width of the RecentChanges page will be greater then a width of
+>> user's browser. I hate these pages. So I propose to display a list of
+>> changed pages in a column, not in a row. --Pawel
\ No newline at end of file