X-Git-Url: http://git.vanrenterghem.biz/git.ikiwiki.info.git/blobdiff_plain/cf597d71665d11815640569eda017825ca0c20bc..0993933ea30f4fb28402f12a033cdd37015da427:/doc/bugs/markdown_bug:_email_escaping_and_plus_addresses.mdwn diff --git a/doc/bugs/markdown_bug:_email_escaping_and_plus_addresses.mdwn b/doc/bugs/markdown_bug:_email_escaping_and_plus_addresses.mdwn index 875de48c8..6fccc5c86 100644 --- a/doc/bugs/markdown_bug:_email_escaping_and_plus_addresses.mdwn +++ b/doc/bugs/markdown_bug:_email_escaping_and_plus_addresses.mdwn @@ -8,7 +8,7 @@ compare: It seems putting a '+' in there throws it. Maybe it's a markdown bug, or maybe the obfuscation markdown applies to email-links is being caught by the HTML sanitizer. - -- [[JonDowland]] + -- [[users/Jon]] > It's a markdown bug. For some reason, markdown doesn't recognize the email with a '+' as an email: > @@ -17,12 +17,20 @@ It seems putting a '+' in there throws it. Maybe it's a markdown bug, or maybe t > > htmlscrubber then (rightly) removes this unknown tag. > + +>> Filed [in CPAN](http://rt.cpan.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=37909) +>> --[[Joey]] [[!tag done]] + > But I've noticed some other Text::Markdown bugs that, even with htmlscrubber, produce > [ill-formed (X)HTML](http://validator.w3.org/check?uri=http%3A%2F%2Fikiwiki.info%2Fbugs%2Fmarkdown_bug%3A_email_escaping_and_plus_addresses%2F). > (View the markdown source of this page.) > > --Gabriel +>> The htmlscrubber does not attempt to produce valid html from invalid. It +>> attempts to prevent exploits in html. The tidy plugin can force html to +>> valid. --[[Joey]] + -