X-Git-Url: http://git.vanrenterghem.biz/git.ikiwiki.info.git/blobdiff_plain/c7d332e8e8d65ac24ea7e040fa14ecd12e5812d6..365e11783b741e459f4c1cb3595def5211442c2e:/doc/plugins/conditional/discussion.mdwn

diff --git a/doc/plugins/conditional/discussion.mdwn b/doc/plugins/conditional/discussion.mdwn
index 7bffcd22c..6e84fdfc1 100644
--- a/doc/plugins/conditional/discussion.mdwn
+++ b/doc/plugins/conditional/discussion.mdwn
@@ -1,3 +1,28 @@
+## Conditional broken?
+
+Using \[\[!if test="tagged(plugin)" then="= Tagged as plugin =" else="*No plugins found*"]] on this wiki *should* present the 'Tagged as plugin' heading, instead it emits 'no plugins found'. Is the conditional plugin currently broken for tags or am I misusing it? Thanks.
+
+-- Thiana
+
+> This wiki has no page named "plugin", so nothing links to it; tags are a species of link
+> so tagging a large number of pages with a tag that doesn't exist (which change has
+> been reverted) doesn't make the pagespec match. It would if the tag's page existed. --[[Joey]]
+
+>> So if I understand this correctly... Assuming the tags Tag_A and Tag_B, the existence of 
+>> @wiki-home@/tags/Tag_A.creole, and a number of files with a \[\[!tag Tag_A Tag_B]] the 
+>> following is correct?
+>>
+>> * \[\[!if test="tagged(Tag_A)" then="OK" else="Fail"]] => OK
+>> * \[\[!if test="tagged(Tag_B)" then="OK" else="Fail"]] => Fail
+>> * \[\[!if test="tagged(Tag_A) and tagged(Tag_B)" then="OK" else="Fail"]] => Fail
+>>
+>> Is that the expected behaviour? If so, that's not what I'm seeing here since they all result 
+>> in a Fail. If not, what exactly is wrong with those conditionals? Thanks.
+>>
+>> -- Thiana 
+
+----
+
 Would there be a way for this plugin to emit fewer blank lines (i.e. *none at all*)?
 
 For example, having a look at [this page](http://www.bddebian.com/~wiki/Hurd/)'s sidebar.
@@ -14,10 +39,38 @@ is supposed to have *no* blank lines between...
 > The blank lines in this example are coming from the newline after `then="`, and also from the newline before the close quote. If you remove those newlines, I think it should work. --[[Joey]]
 
 >> No, that's unfortunately not it, see here:
->> [[if test="enabled(trallala)" then="foot"]]
+>> [[!if test="enabled(trallala)" then="foot"]]
 >> Continued.  But on the other
->> [[if test="enabled(trallala)" then="foot" else="hand:"]]
+>> [[!if test="enabled(trallala)" then="foot" else="hand:"]]
 >> Continued.  --[[tschwinge]]
 
 >>> Seems ok, no? The only linebreaks I see in the source are the ones you
 >>> put at the end of the lines. --[[Joey]]
+
+>>>> Okay, that would explain the linebreak between 1 and 3.  But then, why are all linebreaks removed between 3 and 5?
+
+>>>> 1 No, that's unfortunately not it, see here:
+>>>> [[!if test="enabled(trallala)" then="foot"]]
+>>>> 3 Continued.  But on the other
+>>>> [[!if test="enabled(trallala)" then="foot" else="hand:"]]
+>>>> 5 Continued.  --[[tschwinge]]
+
+>>>>> The conditional after 1 evaluates to "", so there's a blank line
+>>>>> there. The one after 3 evaluates to "hand:", so no blank line there.
+>>>>> --[[Joey]]
+
+I have a sidebar that contains
+<pre>
+  #### Archives
+
+  \[[!calendar type="year" months_per_row="6"  pages="blog/* and !*/Discussion"]]
+  \[[!calendar type="month" pages="blog/* and !*/Discussion"]]
+  &lt;h4&gt;Indices&lt;/h4&gt
+  \[[!map pages="archives/* and !*/Discussion"]]
+</pre>
+I am trying to make it so that the archives and index only show up if the destpage is either blog/* or / -- the top of the wiki. Unfortunately, I don't think I am getting the
+conditional right -- I have a "]] left over at the end (looking at the rendered html). Ideally, I would like to be able to do todays calendar on the top level pagel and 
+the annual calendar on archives/200[4567].mdwn, and monthly calendars for the proper month on archives/200[4567]/[0..12].mdwn. Do I have to create separate sidebars?
+I do not use the usedir directive, so all my annual archive pages live in archives/, and all my monthly archive pages live in, say, archives/2007/ --ManojSrivastava
+
+> Are you using triple quoting for the text in the conditional? --[[Joey]]