X-Git-Url: http://git.vanrenterghem.biz/git.ikiwiki.info.git/blobdiff_plain/c5d63c549de267dfc5de44f60b619f576e57023d..7d48b885c9b491afa798008f8ad00b008a5560ee:/doc/todo/git-annex_support.mdwn diff --git a/doc/todo/git-annex_support.mdwn b/doc/todo/git-annex_support.mdwn index 2f636630c..c49cab4d2 100644 --- a/doc/todo/git-annex_support.mdwn +++ b/doc/todo/git-annex_support.mdwn @@ -96,4 +96,149 @@ See the [[discussion]] for a followup on that. --[[anarcat]] Alternative implementation ========================== -An alternative implementation, which remains to be detailed but is mentionned in [[forum/ikiwiki_and_big_files]], is to use the [[underlay]] feature combined with the `hardlink` option to deploy the git-annex'd files. Then git-annex is separate from the base ikiwiki git repo. --[[anarcat]] +An alternative implementation, which remains to be detailed but is mentionned in [[forum/ikiwiki_and_big_files]], is to use the [[underlay]] feature combined with the `hardlink` option to deploy the git-annex'd files. Then git-annex is separate from the base ikiwiki git repo. See also [[tips/Ikiwiki_with_git-annex__44___the_album_and_the_underlay_plugins]] for an example. + +Also note that ikiwiki-hosting has a [patch waiting](https://ikiwiki-hosting.branchable.com/todo/git-annex_support) to allow pushes to work with git-annex. This could potentially be expanded to sync content to the final checkout properly, avoiding some of the problems above (esp. wrt to non-annex bare repos). + +Combined with the [[underlay]] feature, this could work very nicely indeed... --[[anarcat]] + +Here's an attempt: + +
+cd /home/user
+git clone source.git source.annex
+cd source.annex
+git annex direct
+cd ../source.git
+git annex group . transfer
+git remote add annex ../source.annex
+git annex sync annex
+
+ +Make sure the `hardlink` setting is enabled, and add the annex as an underlay, in `ikiwiki.setup`: + +
+hardlink: 1
+add_underlays:
+- /home/w-anarcat/source.annex
+
+ +Then moving files to the underlay is as simple as running this command in the bare repo: + +
+#!/bin/sh
+
+echo "moving big files to annex repository..."
+git annex move --to annex
+
+ +I have added this as a hook in `$HOME/source.git/hooks/post-receive` (don't forget to `chmod +x`). + +The problem with the above is that the underlay wouldn't work: for some reason it wouldn't copy those files in place properly. Maybe it's freaking out because it's a full copy of the repo... My solution was to make the source repository itself a direct repo, and then add it as a remote to the bare repo. --[[anarcat]] + +Back from the top +================= + +Obviously, the final approach of making the `source` repository direct mode will fail because ikiwiki will try to commit files there from the web interface which will fail (at best) and (at worst) add big files into git-annex (or vice-versa, not sure what's worse actually). + +Also, I don't know how others here made the underlay work, but it didn't work for me. I think it's because in the "source" repository, there are (dead) symlinks for the annexed files. This overrides the underlay, because of [[security]] - although I am unclear as to why this is discarded so early. So in order to make the original idea above work properly (ie. having a separate git-annex repo in direct mode) work, we must coerce ikiwiki into tolerating symlinks in the srcdir a little more: + +
+diff --git a/IkiWiki.pm b/IkiWiki.pm
+index 1043ef4..949273c 100644
+--- a/IkiWiki.pm
++++ b/IkiWiki.pm
+@@ -916,11 +916,10 @@ sub srcfile_stat {
+        my $file=shift;
+        my $nothrow=shift;
+
+-       return "$config{srcdir}/$file", stat(_) if -e "$config{srcdir}/$file";
+-       foreach my $dir (@{$config{underlaydirs}}, $config{underlaydir}) {
+-               return "$dir/$file", stat(_) if -e "$dir/$file";
++       foreach my $dir ($config{srcdir}, @{$config{underlaydirs}}, $config{underlaydir}) {
++               return "$dir/$file", stat(_) if (-e "$dir/$file" && ! -l "$dir/$file");
+        }
+-       error("internal error: $file cannot be found in $config{srcdir} or underlay") unless $nothrow;
++       error("internal error: $file cannot be found in $config{srcdir} or underlays @{$config{underlaydirs}} $config{underlaydir}") unless $nothrow;
+        return;
+ }
+
+diff --git a/IkiWiki/Render.pm b/IkiWiki/Render.pm
+index 9d6f636..e0b4cf8 100644
+--- a/IkiWiki/Render.pm
++++ b/IkiWiki/Render.pm
+@@ -337,7 +337,7 @@ sub find_src_files (;$$$) {
+
+                if ($underlay) {
+                        # avoid underlaydir override attacks; see security.mdwn
+-                       if (! -l "$abssrcdir/$f" && ! -e _) {
++                       if (1 || ! -l "$abssrcdir/$f" && ! -e _) {
+                                if (! $pages{$page}) {
+                                        push @files, $f;
+                                        push @IkiWiki::underlayfiles, $f;
+
+ +Now obviously this patch is incomplete: I am not sure we actually avoid the attack, ie. i am not sure the check in `srcdir()` is sufficient to remove completely the check in `find_src_files()`. + +After reviewing the code further, it seems that `find_src_files` in three places in ikiwiki: + +
+../IkiWiki/Render.pm:421:	find_src_files(1, \@files, \%pages);
+../IkiWiki/Render.pm:846:		($files, $pages)=find_src_files();
+../po/po2wiki:18:my ($files, $pages)=IkiWiki::find_src_files();
+
+ +The first occurence is in `IkiWiki::Render::process_changed_files`, where it is used mostly for populating `@IkiWiki::underlayfiles`, the only side effect of +`find_src_files`. The second occurence is in `IkiWiki::Render::refresh`. There things are a little more complicated (to say the least) and a lot of stuff happens. To put it in broad terms, first it does a `IkiWiki::Render::scan` and then a `IkiWiki::Render::render`. The last two call `srcfile()` appropriately (where i put an extra symlink check), except for `will_render()` in `scan`, which I can't figure out right now and that seems to have a lot of global side effects. It still looks fairly safe at first glance. The `rcs_get_current_rev`, `refresh`, `scan` and `rendered` hooks are also called in there, but I assume those to be safe, since they are called with sanitized values already. + +The patch does work: the files get picked up from the underlay and properly hardlinked into the target `public_html` directory! So with the above patch, then the following hook in `source.git/hooks/post-receive`: + +
+#!/bin/sh
+
+OLD_GIT_DIR="$GIT_DIR"
+unset GIT_DIR
+echo "moving big files to annex repository..."
+git annex copy --to annex
+git annex sync annex
+
+ +(I am not sure anymore why GIT_DIR is necessary, but I remember it destroyed all files in my repo because git-annex synced against the `setup` branch in the parent directory. fun times.) + +Then the `annex` repo is just a direct clone of the source.git: + +
+cd /home/user
+git clone --shared source.git annex
+cd annex
+git annex direct
+cd ../source.git
+git remote add annex ../annex
+
+ +And we need the following config: + +
+hardlink: 1
+add_underlays:
+- /home/w-anarcat/annex
+add_plugins:
+- underlay
+
+ +... and the `ikiwiki-hosting` patch mentionned earlier to allow git-annex-shell to run at all. Also, the `--shared` option will [make git-annex use hardlinks itself between the two repos](https://git-annex.branchable.com/todo/wishlist:_use_hardlinks_for_local_clones/), so the files will be available for download as well. --[[anarcat]] + +> ...aaaand this doesn't work anymore. :( i could have sworn this was working minutes ago, but for some reason the annexed files get skipped again now. :( Sorry for the noise, the annex repo wasn't in direct mode - the above works! --[[anarcat]] + +This [[patch]] still applies - anything else I should be doing here to try to get this fixed? A summary maybe? --[[anarcat]] + +> Sorry, I don't have the mental bandwidth at the moment to work through the +> implications of this change. I know you want this feature, I know it's an +> attractive solution to several use cases, and git annex support is in the +> queue, but at right now I'm still trying to deal with mitigating +> CVE-2016-3714, and the last thing I want to do is merge new security +> risks. --[[smcv]] + +> > No problem at all, glad that you still have that in the queue, and I hope +> > my work was somewhat useful in pushing this forward! Thanks for taking +> > care of the Imagetragick situation... :/ --[[anarcat]]