X-Git-Url: http://git.vanrenterghem.biz/git.ikiwiki.info.git/blobdiff_plain/bb93fccf0690344aa77f9538a508959a6de09847..0c28536117d55fbc3a97ea59f1b37e5ef8807a34:/doc/todo/structured_page_data.mdwn?ds=sidebyside diff --git a/doc/todo/structured_page_data.mdwn b/doc/todo/structured_page_data.mdwn index 22f67cc0a..72bfd8dea 100644 --- a/doc/todo/structured_page_data.mdwn +++ b/doc/todo/structured_page_data.mdwn @@ -82,6 +82,10 @@ See also: > rather than all pages linked from a given page. > >The first use case is handled by having a template in the page creation. You could + + + + >have some type of form to edit the data, but that's just sugar on top of the template. >If you were going to have a web form to edit the data, I can imagine a few ways to do it: > @@ -243,8 +247,9 @@ in a large number of other cases. > would match `data_eq(Depends on,6)`, `data_link(Depends on,bugs/bugA)`, `data_link(Depends on,bugs/bugB)` > or, if you applied the patch in [[todo/tracking_bugs_with_dependencies]] then you can use 'defined pagespecs' -> such as `data_link(Depends on,~openBugs)`. The ability to label links like this allows separation of +> such as `data_link(Depends on,~openBugs)`. The ability to label links like this allows separation of > dependencies between bugs from arbitrary links. +>> This issue (the need for distinguished kinds of links) has also been brought up in other discussions: [[tracking_bugs_with_dependencies#another_kind_of_links]] (deps vs. links) and [[tag_pagespec_function]] (tags vs. links). --Ivan Z. ----