X-Git-Url: http://git.vanrenterghem.biz/git.ikiwiki.info.git/blobdiff_plain/b94b0b564d90b357d2cb1ba5a5d364f8802fed3b..968598b1bb333cc617f03948239aa9cba60566c3:/doc/plugins/contrib/po.mdwn diff --git a/doc/plugins/contrib/po.mdwn b/doc/plugins/contrib/po.mdwn index fba8de282..13176aac4 100644 --- a/doc/plugins/contrib/po.mdwn +++ b/doc/plugins/contrib/po.mdwn @@ -330,10 +330,7 @@ daring a timid "please pull"... or rather, please review again :) --[[intrigeri]] > Ok, I've reviewed and merged into my own po branch. It's looking very -> mergeable. I would still like to go over the `po.pm` code in detail and -> review it, but it's very complex, and I'm happy with all the changes -> outside `po.pm`. (Reviewed the first 520 lines, up to injected -> functions.) +> mergeable. > > * Is it worth trying to fix compatability with `indexpages`? >> @@ -363,12 +360,30 @@ daring a timid "please pull"... or rather, please review again :) > * What's the reasoning behind checking that the link plugin > is enabled? AFAICS, the same code in the scan hook should > also work when other link plugins like camelcase are used. +>> +>> That's right, fixed. +>> > * In `pagetemplate` there is a comment that claims the code > relies on `genpage`, but I don't see how it does; it seems > to always add a discussion link? +>> +>> It relies on IkiWiki::Render's `genpage` as this function sets the +>> `discussionlink` template param iff it considers a discussion link +>> should appear on the current page. That's why I'm testing +>> `$template->param('discussionlink')`. +>> > * Is there any real reason not to allow removing a translation? > I'm imagining a spammy translation, which an admin might not > be able to fix, but could remove. +>> +>> On the other hand, allowing one to "remove" a translation would +>> probably lead to misunderstandings, as such a "removed" translation +>> page would appear back as soon as it is "removed" (with no strings +>> translated, though). I think an admin would be in a position to +>> delete the spammy `.po` file by hand using whatever VCS is in use. +>> Not that I'd really care, but I am slightly in favour of the way +>> it currently works. +>> > * Re the meta title escaping issue worked around by `change`. > I suppose this does not only affect meta, but other things > at scan time too. Also, handling it only on rebuild feels @@ -380,7 +395,12 @@ daring a timid "please pull"... or rather, please review again :) > re-run the scan hooks, passing them modified content (either converted > from po to mdwn or with the escaped stuff cheaply de-escaped). (Of > course the scan hook would need to avoid calling itself!) +> +> (This doesn't need to block the merge, but I hope it can be addressed +> eventually..) > > --[[Joey]] >> +>> I'll think about it soon. +>> >> --[[intrigeri]]