X-Git-Url: http://git.vanrenterghem.biz/git.ikiwiki.info.git/blobdiff_plain/b46e0579328bcc228936397d52dcc88710f95125..3fe434189b99daf3d8cc075186c4ed4ebdd43b8f:/doc/todo/osm_arbitrary_layers.mdwn diff --git a/doc/todo/osm_arbitrary_layers.mdwn b/doc/todo/osm_arbitrary_layers.mdwn index a2e41dc61..d59f394ee 100644 --- a/doc/todo/osm_arbitrary_layers.mdwn +++ b/doc/todo/osm_arbitrary_layers.mdwn @@ -1,4 +1,4 @@ -[[!template id=gitbranch branch=anarcat/master author="[[anarcat]]"]] +[[!template id=gitbranch branch=anarcat/osm_arbitrary_layers author="[[anarcat]]"]] I got tired of hacking at the osm.pm every time I wanted to change the layers, so I made it so the layers can be changed in the .setup file. In my master branch, there are now two new configuration settings: `osm_layers` and `osm_layers_order` which replace the hackish `osm_mapurl`. The variables are a hash and an array that allow the operator to define the list of URLs to be loaded as layers and also to change the order of layers. -- [[users/anarcat]] @@ -24,3 +24,20 @@ I got tired of hacking at the osm.pm every time I wanted to change the layers, s >>> --[[Joey]] >>>> The layers are ordered because that's the way they are displayed in the menu. Take a look at the base layers on the top left here for an idea: . -- [[anarcat]] + +>>>> After sleeping over this - maybe it would be simpler if `osm_layers` was just an array. First, it would get rid of the duplication with `osm_layers_order`. Then I do not feel that having the keys in that hash is worth the duplication anymore. The only reason this is a hash is to provide an arbitrary string description for the layers. We could replace this with an automated description based on the path to the tiles provided. +>>>> +>>>> If that's an acceptable solution for you, I'll go right ahead and rewrite this in a separate branch for merging. Note that on my master branch, there are now 3 main changes that are not merged: arbitrary OSM layers (includes Google Maps support), KML formatting improvements (indentation, non-duplication of tags), minor OpenLayers improvements (don't sort layers arbitrarily, folders support, higher default zoom level and projection fixes). I can either make a branch for those three things or leave it on my master branch, but be warned that it will be hard to separate those as distinct/orthogonal patches as they mangle each other quite a bit. +>>>> +>>>> So basically, I need to know two things from you: +>>>> +>>>> 1. on the layers design: a) hash (which include arbitrary descriptions) + default value or b) a simple array with automated descriptions +>>>> 2. the above changes on a single branch or on 3 different ones? +>>>> +>>>> Thanks for your time. -- [[anarcat]] + +>>>>> I have implemented 1.b) and 2. (ie. it's a simple array now, and I split this stuff in different branches.) I'll open another todo for the other branches. --[[anarcat]] + +>>>>>> [[merged|done]] --[[Joey]] + +Confirmed, thanks!! --[[anarcat]]