X-Git-Url: http://git.vanrenterghem.biz/git.ikiwiki.info.git/blobdiff_plain/b060e691acfada6868ce8c7d3a6f7787e2470771..a5e84ae3fd07eee895520dcadd0294252539ffee:/doc/bugs/Checksum_errors_on_the_pristine-tar_branch.mdwn diff --git a/doc/bugs/Checksum_errors_on_the_pristine-tar_branch.mdwn b/doc/bugs/Checksum_errors_on_the_pristine-tar_branch.mdwn index 226eae85b..471dad98c 100644 --- a/doc/bugs/Checksum_errors_on_the_pristine-tar_branch.mdwn +++ b/doc/bugs/Checksum_errors_on_the_pristine-tar_branch.mdwn @@ -43,21 +43,19 @@ The operation fails on these files with a "Checksum validation failed" error fro > Yes, on Debian unstable I got failures on only old ones, but not in > contiguous blocks: --[[Joey]] - -
-ikiwiki_2.20.tar.gz -ikiwiki_2.30.tar.gz -ikiwiki_2.31.1.tar.gz -ikiwiki_2.46.tar.gz -ikiwiki_2.47.tar.gz -ikiwiki_2.48.tar.gz -ikiwiki_2.49.tar.gz -ikiwiki_2.50.tar.gz -ikiwiki_2.51.tar.gz -ikiwiki_2.62.1.tar.gz -ikiwiki_2.62.tar.gz -- +> +> ikiwiki_2.20.tar.gz +> ikiwiki_2.30.tar.gz +> ikiwiki_2.31.1.tar.gz +> ikiwiki_2.46.tar.gz +> ikiwiki_2.47.tar.gz +> ikiwiki_2.48.tar.gz +> ikiwiki_2.49.tar.gz +> ikiwiki_2.50.tar.gz +> ikiwiki_2.51.tar.gz +> ikiwiki_2.62.1.tar.gz +> ikiwiki_2.62.tar.gz +> > Probably what would help debug this problem is if someone can > reproduce with one or more of the other ones that do **not** fail > for me, pass `-dk` to pristine-tar, and send me a copy of its temp directory @@ -74,6 +72,20 @@ ikiwiki_2.62.tar.gz > this in ikiwiki's pristine-tar info, not other packages'. > (Checked all of debhelper's and alien's and etckeeper's > and pristine-tar's tarballs.) --[[Joey]] +> +>> It looks as though I only get the same failures as you, so that's no help +>> (reassuring, though, since we're presumably both running recent Debian). +>> sunny256's failure cases might just result from the older tar and pristine-tar +>> on Ubuntu 10.04? --[[smcv]] + +>>> Yes, I can reproduce the same failures sunny256 saw using Debian oldstable. Once I +>>> upgrade pristine-tar and tar, it goes away, so I think it is the 100 +>>> byte filename bug affecting those. +>>> +>>> As to the ones we all see fail, I dunno what it is, but probably +>>> has to do with some kind of historical issue in the versions of +>>> pristine-tar/tar used to create them. We may never know what went wrong +>>> there. --[[Joey]] [[done]] A complete output of the "pristine-tar checkout" of all files is stored on