X-Git-Url: http://git.vanrenterghem.biz/git.ikiwiki.info.git/blobdiff_plain/af8e847c7b572cf1c8a18bf9fe14b7172058fd5c..ba9b808c898a556541057ac9f524db2de2a33d77:/doc/bugs/markdown_bug:_email_escaping_and_plus_addresses.mdwn

diff --git a/doc/bugs/markdown_bug:_email_escaping_and_plus_addresses.mdwn b/doc/bugs/markdown_bug:_email_escaping_and_plus_addresses.mdwn
index 875de48c8..6fccc5c86 100644
--- a/doc/bugs/markdown_bug:_email_escaping_and_plus_addresses.mdwn
+++ b/doc/bugs/markdown_bug:_email_escaping_and_plus_addresses.mdwn
@@ -8,7 +8,7 @@ compare:
 
 It seems putting a '+' in there throws it. Maybe it's a markdown bug, or maybe the obfuscation markdown applies to email-links is being caught by the HTML sanitizer.
 
- -- [[JonDowland]]
+ -- [[users/Jon]]
 
 > It's a markdown bug. For some reason, markdown doesn't recognize the email with a '+' as an email:
 >
@@ -17,12 +17,20 @@ It seems putting a '+' in there throws it. Maybe it's a markdown bug, or maybe t
 >
 > htmlscrubber then (rightly) removes this unknown tag.
 >
+
+>> Filed [in CPAN](http://rt.cpan.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=37909)
+>> --[[Joey]] [[!tag done]]
+
 > But I've noticed some other Text::Markdown bugs that, even with htmlscrubber, produce
 > [ill-formed (X)HTML](http://validator.w3.org/check?uri=http%3A%2F%2Fikiwiki.info%2Fbugs%2Fmarkdown_bug%3A_email_escaping_and_plus_addresses%2F).
 > (View the markdown source of this page.)
 >
 > --Gabriel
 
+>> The htmlscrubber does not attempt to produce valid html from invalid. It
+>> attempts to prevent exploits in html. The tidy plugin can force html to
+>> valid. --[[Joey]]
+
 <tt>
 
 -