X-Git-Url: http://git.vanrenterghem.biz/git.ikiwiki.info.git/blobdiff_plain/ac8e8f5ad7387a815cb0eb1b0a662694c86f2439..be6ca4c4e99c40f4c4763147c798a6f144dadc0c:/doc/todo/clear_page_to_delete.mdwn?ds=inline

diff --git a/doc/todo/clear_page_to_delete.mdwn b/doc/todo/clear_page_to_delete.mdwn
index eddce79b4..6bab6ef27 100644
--- a/doc/todo/clear_page_to_delete.mdwn
+++ b/doc/todo/clear_page_to_delete.mdwn
@@ -4,7 +4,7 @@ cleared to be entirely empty (or only have whitespace)? Discuss. --[[Joey]]
  I'd say so; yes. A method of deleting pages via the web would be great; I
 can't think of a use of keeping blank pages around. What about vandalism --
 if someone blanks a page and deletes it and someone else wishes to restore
-it; or is undoing edits via the web a bigger issue? -- [[JonDowland]]
+it; or is undoing edits via the web a bigger issue? -- [[users/Jon]]
 
 Of course there's already a way to delete pages (remove plugin). So the
 question is really:
@@ -18,3 +18,16 @@ offending change. --[[Joey]]
 I don't think we need a second way to delete pages, which would probably be
 used by the only few people who will learn it's possible by random
 documentation reading, find it useful, *and* remember it. -- [[intrigeri]]
+
+On the other hand, clearing the page's whole content essentially means deleting
+the page.  That's what the user intended to do in this case.  The information
+content of an empty vs. a deleted page is essentially the same, I'd say.  But
+having ikiwiki remove those stale pages would save some (minimal, admittedly)
+time needed for manual clean-up.  --[[tschwinge]]
+
+On EmacsWiki, a page is marked for deletion when it contains just the DeletedPage 
+keyword and if there were no page editions since XX days. Here, I use pages that
+can be empty everyday and filled all day long. It does not make sense to me to 
+delete these pages :). --[[xma]]
+
+I was not aware of [[plugins/remove]]. I don't think another method is necessary -- [[users/Jon]]